In short: It's a tough course but very rewarding if you can finish. In full: It's a tough course but very rewarding if you can finish.
The marshals are very patient and they do not put a time limit on the race. Great news for us fun runners.
The hills provide a good challenge the more experienced runners who want to test themselves.
I'm told that next year will be the 50th time this race has been held! There are big plans being made and the organisers have already attracted sponsorhip for 2006. I'm looking forward to it already. Date of review: May 28, 2005
In short: Well-organised, quick, flat, nice goody bag, very good race In full: Only negative was a couple of narrow sections made it hard to get clear of slower runners early on, mostly paths were wide and flat, generally very good. I also remember thinking it would be better if it was run the other way round the course but I can't remember why. Date of review: May 27, 2005
In short: as long as you know it is really a fun run for charities it is fine In full: I think this race is fine, a agree with the point that they shoudl have bmade it slightly more intersting scenicly as it is odd to hjave a race where you aren't going to get you pb due to people being v slow and walkign holding hands so it owuld be better if you had more to look at to take your mind off it. only other gripe had problems finding a toilet beforehand. other than that i think it is a race for people who don't run and due to the lovely atmosphere it succeeds at that very well Date of review: May 27, 2005