In short: Tough Race Not Recommended For Beginners In full: Enjoyable scenic races, but steep in places, same about the cheap medal, for such a hard course you should get a good quality medal even if it means its dearer to enter Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: Pleasant Enough Run, In full: Reasonable Race, Travelled a long way to compete, so was dissapointed in receiving such a cheap medal for completing what is a hard race. Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: Very scenic and marshalling was very good, other than that a complete shambles. In full: With no parking provided near the start, a long walk is required after completing the race. The start was a shambles, trying to squeeze over 1000 runners in a narrow street. Clearly some didn't even make it to the start on time. Water stations were diabolical I had to wait on a couple occassions for them to pour the drink in the cup, perhaps some "queue here" signs would help!!!! The approach to the finish was very congested. If a better starting location could be found, this would be a good race. I think TWBC need to level their footpaths as well. Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: Very Enjoyable Fast Race In full: Highly recommed, Will definitley be doing this race next year, Really liked the finishers medal, same the t-shirts were £15 Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: Definate PB potential especially as other local 10m runs tend to be hilly In full: Yeah so it wasn't clear where the finish line was, but from where i run a couple of seconds here or there are not going to ruin my day. Some pointer of the direction back to race HQ would have been useful, I went with the flow and jst hoped that they had got into the car park as well.
Generally well organised with good and friendly marshalls, well done to Pocklington Runners
In short: Definitely NOT a flat race!! A lack of mile markers in many places! In full: This was definitely NOT a flat race with a horrendous uphill section starting at mile 3 for approximately 1 mile and then a steep downhill for a further mile.
There was a distinct lack of mile markers, not sure if these were blown off by the gale force winds, but it was rather off putting. Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: Challenging but scenic route In full: Really enjoyed the course and the hills weren't as bad as I had been led to believe. Even managed a PB! Was disapointed in the start as got caught in the bottle-neck coming out of the hall and then again on the footpath and missed it by 2 mins, along with loads of other people. Felt sorry for those who might have been in with a chance of a place. Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: Fine example of why cross country beats road running. In full: Excellent race organised by runners for runners - well done Pewsey RC yet again. Just 2 suggestions 1/ Run 1 or maybe 2 of the hills at a slight angle so that with great effort they would be just about runable. 2/ Take out stile at top of 1 of the hills - I hear some runners had to queue for 5 minutes. Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: It's a race that reminds people why we run.... In full: My first time in this race but I intend coming back. It's a race where you discover if you have done the work before or not (as I did) and that put together toughness with scenary and enjoyment... as well as the satisfaction of reaching the finish line. Date of review: February 27, 2006
In short: Hilly for those of us outside the pennines!! In full: Really enjoyed this in a masochistic kind of way. More hills than Leeds natives are used to made it pretty tough going. But the scenery's pretty good, as was the organisation. Would definitely do it again. A great way to start the year. Date of review: February 27, 2006