In short: A good training run for spring marathons, bit crowded at the start, but this always helps me to keep my pace down for the 1st 3 miles. In full: I've done this 16 miler twice a year for the last 3 years, so you get used to the organisation and route. It's very flat and after the 1st 3 to 4 miles you can pick up the pace if you want to. Lucozade stations at 3 points on the 2 laps + water. I find it a good marathon training run for pacing, keeps me slow at the start and then allows me to find a comfortable pace for the rest of the run. I then usually run from the finish out to the 2 mile marker and back to get a 20 miler in total, in. They give you a mug at the finish, with date and event on it. Lucozade again in abundance at finish. Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: Cheery marshalls saved otherwise dull day! In full: Okay as FLM warm up, but would have preferred to stick to my home 20 mile circuit. Loo provisions were crazy - 2 mens loos at the start meant that a long wait after long drive to Worthing...not fun! Course pretty uninspiring and agree with comments about the traffic. However (most) marshalls did an excellent job at controlling traffic and encouraging runners. Also water stations were well manned (great job by all the willing kids!) although paper cups are always a nightmare. Bag drop did not seem to work that well but fortunately plenty of parking nearby to store bags in car.
Organisers were very friendly but whole thing did not bear up to comparison with other recent races (eg Fleet HM, Guildford G3). Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: In full: Long walk to car park, especially after running 20 miles, could do with a bit more atmosphere, felt like a training run at times, cold showers, well marshalled Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: great In full: One of the better races over my 5 years of running. Excellant control and thanks to everyone.If only the mad cars would slow down it would have been even better Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: Great training for FLM. Atmosphere good, parking for venue great, plenty of water stations and energy drink. Good running past 8 milers makes you run faster! Just meant the 2nd part of the 16 mile was quite quiet! Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: Challenging course, not enough parking or loos. In full: We arrived an hour before the start but couldn't park in the car park had to park in a side street, not enough loos, apart from that it was well organised and a challenging course, ideal preparartion for a marathon. Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: Generally a pretty good race – better than last year, anyway (April 2005). In full: As pointed out in most of the posts, the course was seriously crowded in places, but overall the event was well organised and a great way to spend a Sunday morning. I was a bit concerned about the lack of security at the baggage section, though. £1 to have my bag trampled on and left in the wrong pile. Not ideal!!!
In short: The wind took your breath away, the hills took your legs away and the the mud cost some their dignity! - But what Fun!! In full: Great race,I may be struggling with stairs today but im still smiling!! If you like cross country you should love this, buckets of mud, a knee deep river crossing (thigh deep when your only 5'1) and enough hills to keep things interesting. Good organisation and a pretty good medal at the end. Only complaint would be the runners who moaned that the course was too muddy to get a PB - wheres your sense of adventure!! (and humour in some cases!!) Going to be back next year for sure (if my trainers dry in time!!) Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: Fast friendly blustery course In full: Very well marshalled - but didn't hear the start. The weather was something-else but still managed to smash a 4 year old PB! Excellent! Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: A good training run In full: The lack of atmosphere does make this more of a training run rather than an 'event'. I live nearby so may do it again but certainly wouldn't travel any distance to take part. I also agree that the organisers should be more concerned with predicted pace/finish time than gender when deciding the starting order. Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: I enjoyed it, but it could have been so much better with better organisation behind it In full: having read everyone else's frustrations, I thought I would add my own. I did the 8 miler and was also frustrated by the narrowness of the first 3 miles and the fact that all comers set off together (it can't be that hard to try stagger the 8 mile start).
Was also annoyed that there was no clock at the finish and they actually charged money for the pitiful and unsecured baggage store and that not all junctions were marshalled.
if it were a small, poor club organising the race then I would feel more tolerant, but Human Race, frankly, can do better than this, bearing in mind the amount they charged for the race.
On the plus side, it is a relatively big event which has its own adrenalin rush and fun factor. And the river section is lovely (if only less people had run 3 abreast along it while I was trying to get past!)
probably would do it again, probably the 16 miler as it is a useful 'bit more than half marathon' distance. Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: very well organised with encouraging marshalls, fairly undulating route In full: Will definitely do this one again, excellent marshalls, plenty of water stops plus the sponges were welcome. Certainly quite undulating so very happy with 3rd faster time, will be back next year Date of review: April 3, 2006
In short: Beautiful scenery and enjoyed the running on the flat In full: A bit crowded but it was good in the sense I could get a feel of what it is going to be like at the 2006 FLM. Enjoyed the almost traffic free route, only disappointment was the lack of security at the baggage counter. Will do it again. Date of review: April 3, 2006