Use our events finder to see or add a rating to any race.You need to join the site free, as a member first.
Little Aston 5 by Alan Simmonds
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised with plenty of marshalls In full: On a very hot day like today, this race was well organised with water @ every mile & marshalls @ junctions. Didn't notice any problems - so it all worked like clockwork.Well done to organisation. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Kerridge Highclere 10K by Slothslow
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely dappled woods, fairly hilly & slippery in places. Not many slowpokes like me at the end but marshalls were wonderfully supportive. In full: This was my first 10k in about 10 years so seriously worried about being stone last. Once I started though, the dappled wooods, grassy knolls and not to mention, Highclere Castle itself, soon took my mind off being last. This is certainly a multi-terrain course with some fairly boggy bits despite the fact that the weather was gorgeous. Possibly starting a little earlier, 10am instead of 10:30am, would have been easier particularly for the back of the field as it was seriously hot coming in after 1 hr 18 min! Organisation was very smooth although I was a little disappointed not to receive the free t-shirt (they had run out) which apparently is to be posted. Thanks to all the cheerful marshalls and small crowd that cheered us on. Definetly worth doing again next year... Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Peterhead 10K by Duncan Noble
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well planned and organised event in only its second year. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
HSBC Cardiff 10K by Boffin
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Race with potential: very badly organised / executed In full: The organisers issued conflicting instructions, from non-existent tear off strips on race numbers to publishing water stations which did not exist. Too many runners for the course & too many sharp turns causing bottlenecks - recking any hope of a PB. Purely a moneyspinner with little consideration for runnability. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Kerridge Highclere 10K by Claire Parris
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: My first 10k. I'll be back next year! Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
HSBC Cardiff 10K by Traby
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very hot, needed more water, happy with time In full: Didn't seem to be much info about what to do etc for beginners. Was running on my own so had to keep asking people what to do, sorry to them! No water at 2.5k so very dehydrated at 6k as it was so hot. Difficult to say if best race ever etc. as it was only my first one. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Regents Park 10K by Garrett Turbett
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: raced these as part of my training for tri's for a few seasons. good fast courses and was more fun than a sunday long run!! now that i'm returning to running after almost three years off having been disabled in an... In full: rta, i'm making this my second event back (the first was a huge run race type thing in denmark, only 6k so it doesn't count :-) Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Dry Hill 10 by Larsen_B
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
HSBC Cardiff 10K by Spike sends Love light and peace
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Got to be one of the best in the country. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Newark Half-Marathon by john crawford 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised & marshalled. Lots of drinks stations In full: The orgaisers must have gone to a great deal of trouble to organise so many volunteers for so many drinks stations. It was a very hot day and this was very much appreciated. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Winston Runners Ladies' 5K by Chick pea
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: This was my first race and I couldn't have picked a better one. In full: The organisers were very helpful when I admitted I was a race virgin, and reassured me I couldn't get lost or end up running the wrong way. They pointed out the toilets, showers, baggage area and start line. There was also a map of the course clearly displayed. The race itself was clearly laid out, with marshalls at every turn who not only showed the way but clapped and cheered all the runners as well. It was a lovely route through the park, patly under the shade of trees. There were clear distance markers. At the end each runner was cheered by the crowds, and given a nice medal and a goody bag with a tshirt, bar of chocolate and carton of fruit juice. There was plenty of cold water in cups at the end as well. I really enjoyed this, my first race. Great location, great organisation. Five stars. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Wissey Half-Marathon by john crawford 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Very enjoyable. Could do with more sponges! Very hot day. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
London Flora Light Challenge for Women 5K by fi-blu
 | | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: personally, I hated this 'race' and found it quite boring. the only challenge was trying not to trip up the person in front as you fairy-stepped around the course. but at least a lot of money was raised for charity. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Chesterfield Spire 10 by Katrina Foley
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Challenging course through some lovely countyside and very well organised. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Garden City 10 by too slow
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good organisation -route not bad some shady cover for hot days In full: Definately one to add to your racing calendar especially for runbers in London area. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Kerridge Highclere 10K by James Atkinson
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Exellent race, hard in places, overall a good day! Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Perivale 5 by Urban Road Runner
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Very fast and flat course, well marshalled, PB potential. In full: + Well marshalled + Fast course + not much traffic + Results quickly available + Useful goody bag (water, banana and chocolate) + secure baggage area + friendly and low key event + lot of prices
- toilets (only one and no seat!) - showers (ony 2 of 4 worked)
Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
Trafford 10K by Audrey Collier
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely course, very flat ..great for beginners on their first 10K - would strongly recommend Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
HSBC Cardiff 10K by JEvaNs*
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Got well below the time I was hoping for but could have been better organised In full: It was the hottest day in a very long time so I certainly wasn't expecting my 53mins! But the roads were closed off late, the race was delayed because of on the line entries, there was only one water station that wasn't very well manned, and at the end they wanted your chip but didn't want you to stop moving, and it wasn't clear where there was water or goody bag collection points. And we missed the award ceremony as that wasn't clearly pointed out either.
Still, I was pleased as punch with my time so that makes it all ok. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
SHORNE WOOD 5 by chrisg9
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: ouch my legs In full: nice friendly crowd, some tough hills which made me wonder why i was running on such a hot morning. Good race though Date of review: September 5, 2004
|

| |