In short: Race organisation good In full: Race organisation good. Infra structure around race like car parking, signage poor. marathon route second half a bit dull and bleak Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: Too many people on too narrow streets In full: It was a great race but no one could run their ideal pace as there was massive congestion until we split with the half marathoners at 12.5 miles.
In short: Great fun will be better next year potentially a great race In full: The rating I gave for organisation reflects the fact that it was a first time race for organisers and I think they need to know where thwey need to improve< rather than how I felt about it I loved the atmosphere and friendlyness, and the little problems only added to this, this could become my favourate race, to anyone who lives near Gloucester/Stroud do this race next year,and the Sharpness to Glaws canal is one of the best training areas I know.Well done to Kev the organiser. Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: see below In full: The 1k marker was more like 1.5k apparently they have been told it was in the wrong place for the last few years but have done nothing about it!!!! Signposting to the event was non existant(we had a lovely tour of local villages and country lanes trying to find it) hence arrived just in time(2 mins before start) to jump out of the car and dash to the start line Marshalling good and nice trophys.!!
In short: This is how it's done, Blackpool! In full: After running this years ridiculously dangerous Blackpool marathon I had placed a lot of expectancy on the organisers of the Nottingham marathon; they didn't disappoint. The race was incredibly well organised, fast and flat (other reviewers mentioned some hills, where???). Managed to get myself a pb and a free malt loaf! Only downside were the very many idiots who failed to line up according to a realistic expected finishing time. Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: Fantastic race, never had it so good in a marathon. In full: It's nice to note that in an era where Sunday trading takes over everything else, Nottingham have managed to keep this fantastic entertainment going. Last time I said this about the Leeds Marathon, they cancelled it the following year and it never reappeared. Let's hope the people of Nottingham can keep this going. It's getting much more difficult to find a full marathon anywhere in the country. Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: A superbly organized flat race along the river to the Oracle shopping centre In full: A superbly organized flat race along the river from Thames Valley Park to the Oracle shopping centre. Particularly liked the inclusion of a drum band this year to keep the tempo. Could be also be heard as you came back to the finish. Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: Well Organised, Well attended.....WELL DONE EVERYONE! In full: A great course, hilly but surprisingly fast.Well marshalled and surprisingly i got a personal best by 15 mins!!! (only my 3rd 10M though) Well done to all involved! Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: Well Organised a trully top event one for the Race Calendar In full: This was my 5th Robin Hood race and although i was 1 min 47 slower than my pb i once again throughly enjoyed the race Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: Enjoyable circuit but very tough for a flat course. In full: This event deserves to grow. Very friendly atmosphere. Organisers learnt a lot I think. First race I have ever done which had a lifeguard!! Distance markers next year please. Liked the little duck memento and the flamingo course markers- nice touches. Well done Slimbridge- hope to be back next year. Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: ver y hot day In full: too hot and hilly for me.did not enjoy 2laps,fun run 1 lap at same time made it over crowded and off putting pace wise.set in a lovely area i thought a more scenic root could have been found Date of review: September 15, 2005
In short: Magnificent , glorious countryside a fell run and a bit of a walk because of the terrain. In full: This is a tough fell race.There is only a mile of road running climbing steep hills and running on top of them for 3 miles was wnderful.The coast path for another four miles is havardous.This was the first time that runners had participated and constructive comments about marshalls for directions were well taken by the management team.In short everone got lost.If you have injuries its not for you.If you want to sample british scenary at its best and not worry about times or get upset if you get lost then it is wonderful. The tea put on for the runners was the best I have had at a race and the water stations were excellent.I respect anyone who puts an event on for the first time.Jonathan W Date of review: September 14, 2005
In short: Enjoyable scenic run with friendly atmosphere. In full: My first 10K so not a lot to compare it with. Scenery was lovely and event seemed well organised and welcoming. Mile/kilometre markers (or even half way sign) would have been useful. (I think it was actually rather longer than 10K). Also an earlier start or evening slightly earlier in the year would be good, as it was pretty dark towards the end. Enjoyed this though and expect to be back for more!
In short: Excellent race, Very nice scenery. I would do this one again. In full: I would recommend this one to anyone. a very nice race along the canal path, part cross-country and then back. Better than the Frampton 10k I'd say and a bit more challenging. Not one for a PB but otherwise it is good value for money and the scenery is excellent. A challenging event and great organisation. It will get bigger and better. Date of review: September 14, 2005