In short: Poole Park runs always well organised by Poole AC.es it was cold and windy , but that's what you would expect really. Nice medal and tee shid rt. Need to dosoemthing baoutthe queuing after teh finish to collectemdal and tee shirt, apart from that , t Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: two tough climbs ! In full: the best half marathon course i have run in ages. two tough climbs made it hard for pbs but you cant have everything. scenery was amazing including a run down the canal side. excellent from the organisational side , well marshalled and i would like to say thank you to all the people who turned out to marshall on such a cold bitter morning to make it such an enjoyable run. Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: Well organised. Good opportunity for a PB. In full: Lots of parking. Lots of space on the way round. Not too sure how the organisers could have done better than they did. Lots of encouragement from the marshals and spectators, too. Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: Fantastic event for all the family In full: This is a fantastic event, where runners and non runners are given great consideration. There are excellent changing, toilet and parking facilities. The marshalling and policing is top rate. Whilst the runners are off doing their thing there is plenty to do for the non runners, including free tea and coffee!
The course is fairly quick, but challenging in places, but this is definitely one race to put in the yearly calender.
Just one thing though, anychance of fencing/roping the finishing straight off from spectators so that the mid pack and slower runners can come home unhindered? Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: 400 runners and chip timing! In full: Drink stations were good with a choice of lucozade and water. Start was very busy and could have benefitted from expected pace start gates. Most marshalls were good, although in one or two places there were none. The finish is the most problematic with long waits for a medal and a drink in the cold. If race had chip timing it would sort a lot of the problems out. But still i had a good fast race and will be back next year. Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: Lovelly low key event in beautiful setting In full: For £5 you get a lovelly run which suits all abilities. I did not miss the water stop as personally the offer of a cup of cold water in the cold conditions would have been ignored anyway! I actually ran a PB although the course does not lend itself to great times. The fact that there was a good range of abilities enabled me to push myself harder so I found it a good training run for the Bath half marathon next week. Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: Sharp race with very promising pb capability In full: An extremely enjoyable half marathon with a fantastic pb capability. Portions of the course were very scenic, portions not, but 13miles is a long way to find perfection! Overall it was a thoroughly enjoyable race and a definate permanent ficture on my future race diary Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: Quick course - definite PB potential In full: Having read some of the other reviews I can understand the frustrations at having to wait in a queue to finish. My major gripe about this race was that for a race of this size with such a high profile sponsor I would have expected chip timing. This would have totally negated the need for all the queues at the end. Fortunately I finished early enough to miss these problems. The course was not as flat as I was led to believe and had numerous sharp turns but still turned out to be surprisingly quick making it definite PB potential (I knocked nearly six minutes off my PB). This was also quite a picturesque course - not what I was expecting in Milton Keynes! and 90% traffic free. Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: I love hills!? In full: Hilly! especially for the 15 miles! was caught out like a fair few by the quick start, but only real problem was as the 15 mile started 15 mins after the 10k, being a reasonably quick runner there were problems in passing several hundred 10k runners and walkers on a long narrow stretch of road (lot's of apologies on both sides!). Really enjoyed the event though, and especially the overwhelming support of the naseby villagers after 12 miles! Date of review: March 12, 2006
In short: Fantastic organisation, tough-ish course, good prep for any spring marathon In full: Enjoyed this a lot more than I was expecting. The organisation seemed to work like clock-work and all the stewards were friendly and smiley. Some definite hills (which were compensated by down stretches too), which became tough the third and fourth time, so it didn't feel like a walk in the park, but the lap structure broke up the distance nicely into manageable chunks. Date of review: March 12, 2006