In short: ran this a few times now and its always well organised In full: fast half but the last three miles always seem hard to me. nice t-shirt nice medal overall spot on Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: Well organised but spectacularly dull In full: I would like to thank the Runner's world pacers - a fantastic resource for a race like this. But you can't get over just how breathtakingly dull a racetrack is to run around. Or how exposed to the wind. I imagine its great if your a petrol head, but not for me. Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: A good day In full: A good run. It would be nice to have had some energy drinks, not just water. Would rather have a T shirt than a medal. Generally a greeat event. Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: Good course, well organised, great atmosphere In full: A really good race. This is the first 'big' race I've done and I really enjoyed it. The organisation seemed very good and all went smoothly. Plenty of drinks stations occupied by enthusiastic cadets. Course itself is pretty flat with really only one short climb x2 up into Queens Square. Definite PB possibilities. The last mile gently uphill was a bit tough though. the crowds were excellent and very supportive. I liked the small lad who kept shouting "go faster!" Only a few small gripes, yes the mile markers - they were too low down at pavemnet level, please put them higher next year. It's a pain when you miss them especially as my Forerunner was saying I'd gone further than I actually had! Also the spectators were allowed to creep onto the course in Queens Square and really narrowed it down. There didn't appear to be any marshalling there. Definitely be back next year. Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: Slashed my time from last year. In full: I am not the fastest runner out there but once again a fantastic turn out again this year well organised lots of press out for lots of photo's I like this race everyone is friendly and helpful. running against the wind on the way home was tough, but I still managed to beat my time from last year by 12 mins. Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: Great day out In full: Very well organised with great crowd support, this was a fantastic day out despite my final time. Highlights, runners village, Great Pulteney Street, the band at Queens square, views of the landmarks and river, drinks stations, the only lowlight being not enough toilets once you were on the course.
Thanks to all the organisers for a good day out. Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: great day well organised , wud do again and again In full: great day out everything well organised, got good bag within seconds of finishing bagging returned very quickly but i was late in , i managed 2 55 in my first half marathon was on for 2 30 until i got severe cramp on 8miles but not put off would recommend to everyone , and everyone so friendly Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: They treat you really well at Ashby In full: Easy parking; good marshalling; water + sponges + High5 on course; goodie bag has just what you want after a tough run; sweatshirt a bonus. I'll definitely be back. Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: Great race... great scenary.... In full: Have to say, good race this, although a fast course? maybe, but there's way faster like the Village Bakery in Wrexham. I'd say this race is around the same as the Helsby Four Villages for speed... however, great atmos on the course with locals making a really biug effort...
Thanks go out to the organisers and the locals for making it a good one.
However, organisers, move with the times and sort out chip timing. Then you won't have slow people at the front ;-) Date of review: March 19, 2006
In short: ish............... In full: Unless you know Plympton,the sign put out saying "race start". not very clear, only other moan no distance markers that i noticed.
A good run though, hills,and there were only two,were long but not over steep.Marshelling was good,with some awkward junctions to control. Nice and scenic down along the Plym Vally trail. Maybe next year the starter could be a little louder as most at the rear seemed not to hear the start, and were caught out slightly. Date of review: March 19, 2006