In short: At the time and especially after 9 miles didn't think so, but looking back would say i did have a good time and was very enjoyable In full: Was a very long day as was at the start for 8, bags on bus for 9 and waiting for nearly 2 hours to start. But there's no option with 50,000 people. Organisation for so many people was superb and thanks to everyone who was there helping with everything. Said straight away that wouldn't do it again, but am now looking forward to next year when I might enjoy it a bit more. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Grown too big? In full: The water stations need to be earlier. The first seemed to be around 5 miles. On a hot day this was too late. I think the procong is getting steep and the numbers too many. The atmosphere is great but don't expect a PB Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: The people of Newcastle, Gateshead and South Shields make this race ! In full: Considering the size of the entry I think it was probably as well organised as it could be. In my opinion this event is not for the serious runner looking for a PB as there are far to many people in general and far to many slow runners towards the front in particular. It is the support from the locals that makes this race a memorable experience. Initially I was a little disappointed with my time of 1:34:26 but when considering the heat and the fact that 4 poor souls collapsed and died, it does put things into perspective. If I come back next year I will forget about times and just accept the event for what it is, a huge charity fundrasing event and there's nothing wrong with that. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Very well organised. Great atmosphere. Pb for me. In full: Small and very well organised event. Nice course, gentle but longish hills. A pb for me in the 10K so very pleased. I'll definitely enter again next year, all being well. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Having done the San Diego half marathon 5 weeks ago, the organisation of this race for the number of runners was dreadful. The water and shower stations should have been much earlier and more frequent. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Glad to be part of, shocked by the heat wave. In full: A very special race to be part of. My training hadn't quite prepared me for the heat and I ended up 12 min/miling after 9 miles. Very distressed by people collapsing around me and passing paramedics. My thoughts go out the families of the four runners, if I hadn't slowed the pace as well I could have easily been in a similar situation. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: good atmosphere, fun race, good support from locals In full: too many people who intended to walk started near the front, overtaking walkers 400m from start line. took 30mins to cross start which could have been better organised. good day out but does it really have to get bigger every year? thanks to all the locals for their support,its what makes the run what it is. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: This is my third and last one. In full: This is a great first half marathon but is a nightmare for anyone who wishes to run as there are too many walkers (several abreast blocking the route) to pass - the organisers need to think about a better start system! Agree with the comments about water - needed to be a water stop much earlier on a day like yesteday.
But the people of Newcastle, Gateshead and South Tyneside are brilliant Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Got to be done once. In full: First time in the GNR. Probably a race to encourage the first timer as there is plenty of support all the way round form buth spectators and participants. Unfortunately it seems set on being the biggest with more entrants every year and so suffers because of it. First Water stop after 5 miles presumable to allow participants to space out, over crowded start with people being penned in for the best part of an hour before the official start time and then eighteen minutes before putting one foot in front of another, and the number of runners of varying abilities meant it was more like an obstacle course. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: This is a really good flat run and was very well organised. I achieved a PB. In full: Firstly I have to point out that the organisation was very good and the staff were very cheerful and helpful. The run itself is fast. I really enjoyed the whole thing, with the exception of the detor through the park near the end. No need for this, please move this to the beginning of the race. Perfect finish would be a run along the seafront. That aside, I will deffinately be doing this agin next year. Only my second 10km and finished in the top 5th of runners. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Excellent organisation, could have flattened the hills though! In full: This was my first marathon and I feel like it will be one of the toughest I ever do. I remember going UP plenty of hills but not down any!
I had a bad day and was a lot slower than the time I secretly wanted, but that shouldn't take anything away from what is an excellently ran event.
I will definitely be back sometime to make amends! Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: The fantastic Great North Run an honour to compete. In full: Fantastic race although could have done with more water due to conditions. Thanx to the public who squirted runners with hose pipes and water gave out ice pops,biscuits,oranges and sweets I couldn't have finished without you. Hope the guy called "Jonathon" who collapsed at 12 mile mark taken to hospital by the red cross made it home safely. Well done to all the medics who gave up their time free of charge such a big race couldn't happen without your time and help. Congratulations Great North Run I look forward to watching you on t.v. next year!NOT!! Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Good run, Lovely scenery, Good Company. In full: Had a real fun day out despite getting a little bit lost. The whole day was good with added extra's like HOT showers,free refreshments,well stocked feeding stations and personal certificates. A big thank you to the organisers, put me down for next years race. Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: It was worth it!! But where were the loos?? In full: I woke up with the beginnings of a cold and so was not expecting much for my first time. I didn't do the warm up and neither did anyone around me in the 10 min mile one, that was disappointing but we were crammed in so tight that losing our place was not an option. The atmosphere was amazing, there could have been more water stations early on and whilst all the guys were relieving themselves in the bushes, the ladies had to wait for one of the scarce toilets, not on guys"" Date of review: September 19, 2005
In short: Great for a fun run In full: Great race but purely for enjoyment - serious running not possible with so many people and to many people to overtake who started in the wrong place - people walking 400 yards from the start!!!! But well organised and an atmosphere real buz Date of review: September 19, 2005