Asics Fleet Pre-London Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (599 votes). | The big picture (599 votes) | | Overall score | | 84% | | How many would do it again? | | 93% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 69% | | PB potential | | 75% | | Atmosphere | | 75% | | Organisation | | 79% | | Value | | 76% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 76% |
|
|
2013 race reviewed by: Flying Marketer
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Wet and well supported half In full: Really wet day meant it was hard to get ready as there was no space left in the marquee, but meant. You wanted to get round quickly to get out of the rain! Couple of hills added a bit of spice... Date of review: June 10, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Terry Stride
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: pace yourself for the hills In full: excellent support and well organised. It was wet and the only down point was the track and grass for the finish. lots of support in the town and even in the rural there were people at 7 miles offering jelly babies Date of review: March 24, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Guy Hornsby 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: March 24, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Bokster
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fast, very gently undulating course, not too crowded at the start - picturesque middle part of the course outside Fleet, good support inside Fleet Date of review: March 23, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Mattarunski
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent race, terrible conditions this year but a PB brightened my day In full: This race has everything going for it. It's professional organised but not too big and busy. I find the course to be fast, the roads are closed and the support along the route is great even on a really wet and miserable morning. Date of review: March 22, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Christopher Medhurst
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well supported and organised race that I return for year after year In full: For a course with few hills this still manages to have interest due to the variety of town, village, woodland and fields. It's really well organised and the volunteers who marshal the course are excellent. This year's event suffered from the weather, but the crowds still turned out to cheer you on. Thank you Fleet! Date of review: March 22, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Mr Barton
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really well-organised half marathon In full: Great race, really well organised. Some very nice scenery and a good, relatively flat course with PB potential. Very friendly crowd and marshalls. The only shame was the weather, but you can't really apportion blame for that! Date of review: March 20, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: elizabeth cocks
 | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fab support throughout the course, well organised In full: A great race, well organised but by far the best part was the spectators out over most of the course. Date of review: March 20, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Mike Pini
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In full: This was Brooks, by the way, not Asics! Date of review: March 19, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: Ami Yetton
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Best half marathon in the UK, very well organised, excellent value for money, great atmosphere and definitely a PB course! Date of review: March 19, 2013
|

| |