Sidcup 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (102 votes). 2006 race reviewed by: shin twigs what the FERC is going on
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Great marshalls v. friendly even enjoyed the rain
In full: Thanks to the marshalls who had to hang around for us plodders at the back. Changing/refreshment facilities were pretty good.
Date of review: February 12, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Aitch S
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Terrible weather which was made tolerable by the friendly marshalls
In full: Nice race but not as flat as advertised (put it this way I wouldn't park my car on the course without the hand brake on!)
Date of review: February 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Johnny J
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Definitely a mid-field packe in the race stakes.
Date of review: February 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Leighton Williams.
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Quick, Well Organised, Friendly Race
In full: This is without doubt a quick and well organised race. The marshalling is excellent, the atmosphere is friendly and there are more than adequate changing and parking facilities. Also, there is the bonus of the tes, coffee, chocolate, sandwiches for sale afterwards, oh, and a nice medal at the end.
I only have two things to comment about, it would have been nice to have had a clock at the finish line showing the race time. Secondly, is it not possible to stop people driving out of the car park until the race is over? I know there is a large gap in abilities of runners, but everyone pays the same entry fee. You don't see 7 or 8 cars trying to get out of the finishing straight when the first few runners are finishing, so why is it acceptable to do this when the last few are finishing. I find this very rude and insulting. I always stay to the end to cheer on the last of the runners, (finished in approx 70 mins) and had an hours drive home, and if we can do this, so can others!
Will be back next year though.
Date of review: February 12, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Julie Gardner 3
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: enjoyed race, medal would of been nice
Date of review: February 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: redordead
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: running in a residential area not necessarily ideal but was OK. Lack of clock at finish line was a disappointment!
Date of review: February 20, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Simon Coughlin
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, fairly flat course.
In full: Well done Kent ac. First time I had done this event. Found it well organised and the marshalls were superb.
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: PeteB
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good local race, well marshalled, would do again
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Warwick Bilham
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very friendly marshals
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: PieNapper
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Fast well organised race
In full: Well Organised with great marshalling, an inexpensive race, and good for a PB.
Scenery is pretty dull though, needed my mp3 player!
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
