Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Congleton Half Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (136 votes).

91 to 100 of 136 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last

2006 race reviewed by: Will Dearnaley
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: A pretty flat course around Cheshire farmland.
Date of review: October 10, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
 

2006 race reviewed by: Richard Green 14
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Very enjoyable local race
Date of review: October 10, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Siggers
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Excellent course, well organised, perfect weather and pb to boot!!!
In full: I was fairly confident of a pb on this course as I knew the first 2 miles, and the hill in it, quite well, the next 7 miles had an overall decline of about 2oo feet, apart from some undulations, thanks to Congleton Harriers website for the info. Well blow me, when I was looking at my watch I was calculating a massive pb, this carried on all the way to the finish with a pb by 14 minutes, you could also put it down to my quality training plan? The sting in the tale isn't too bad short and sharp is probably the best way of putting it but after that again its fairly all down hill to the finish, nice touch with the last 400m having interval markers.

The race was well supported at the start and the finish, and at the black swan pub about half way round, all the marshalls looked like they would have rather been doing something else on a sunday morning, but I think they were all from the local rotary club!!

Anyway this is a great run, definite pb potential, can't see how people think it isn't, great scenery and good organisation. If you've not done it before it's well worth a visit. See you next year!!!
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Tracy Whitehurst 2
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Fun but Challenging, worth the effort
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Sophie Hine
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good race, but pre-paid entries shouldn't have to queue, marshalls should encourage runners more!
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Keith M
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Well organised race, undulating rather than hilly, good value for money
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Russell the Runner
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Got a pb of 1.29. Very pleased
In full: Found this race easier than I thought and the 'sting' wasn't as hard as I expected. Nowhere near as tough as Macclesfield last week.

I was quite surprised to get a pb and just about managed to keep the pace up until the end.

Quite crowded particularly at the start before we left town, narrowly missed a collision. I thought there was a limit of 300 on this race but it was way over that.

A few niggles on the organisation front - no point in pre entering the race as the queue for numbers was very slow and it would have been loads quicker to enter on the day. Also we were told there were no showers - and there were!

But overall the race itself, temperature and atmosphere were excellent and my pb made the day.
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Colin Thorman
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Well organised friendly race, the sting in the tail is not that bad although some earlier hills are tough
In full: Great conditions, the hill just before 2 miles is more of a shock than the sting at 12 miles, maybe because I was waiting for the sting and it was short in duration.Probably not the best race to get a PB in as it is quite undulating. With the 1/4 marathon starting at the same time the pace can seem more daunting than it actually is. It was my first time and I really enjoyed it despite not being on form, will be abck next year
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: flyaway
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Fast field, but the hills were nowhere near as bad as I was dreading!
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: MaccPosh
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Excellent organisation on a very attractive course.
Date of review: October 8, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Runners Need
ah... achilles heel
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013