Crowborough 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (101 votes). 2004 race reviewed by: Hewmatt
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Achieved PB! Well it was my first race, otherwise no chance with that hill, twice!
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: DuncyBoy
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I'm sure that hill was longer and steeper the second time around.
Date of review: November 28, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: amanda pitman
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: I had heard the hill was hard from checking out the feed back on this sight prior to doing the race, however I didn't realise it would be as steep as it was. A fantastic challenge but not one to get a pb with. Amanda Pitman
Date of review: November 28, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Longlegs
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: 2 Laps, tough, tough, tough hills
Date of review: October 31, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Andrew Stiles 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A well organised race with excellent marshalling. Credit to Crowborough Runners and the Lions!
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Worm
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A 10k with two one-km hills. Challenging.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: paul Rawlinson
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: paul Rawlinson
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Bakaman
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Really tough hill that you have to run up twice but the support around the course from spectators was great.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
