Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Fenland 10

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (105 votes).

91 to 100 of 105 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last

2005 race reviewed by: Mark Cozens
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Nice run, pity showers not working
Date of review: October 30, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
 

2005 race reviewed by: Chris Smith
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Nice fast run for club runners really.
Date of review: October 30, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Tony Britt
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good, fast flat course. Ideal for beginners.
Date of review: October 30, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: FG
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: PBtastic
In full: Really enjoyable, well organised race. Fast course that could be a nightmare on a windy day, as Vitalstatistix says. If not, though one to definitely mark up on the diary as possible 10-miler PB attempt.
Date of review: November 12, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Windy Miller
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Cannot find the results anywhere on the internet
In full: Enjoyed the race as Idid a PB.Running out of water at the finish was not good.
Date of review: November 4, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Vitalstatistix
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: On a windy day, this would be a very tough race. With not a breath of wind, however, 2004 was a VERY fast 10 miler indeed. Two flyovers break up what is otherwise an extremely flat course.
Date of review: November 2, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%

In short: Well organised and friendly.
In full: A shame about the water running out at the end. Otherwise excellent organisation. Could have done with a marshal at the rear of the start to slow traffic down.
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Jenni Egmore
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Good race to get pb. Shame about water running out at finish - but lots of late entries. Definitely do it again
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Wobbly Jogger
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Nice course, well marshalled, excellent directions.
In full: negatives, poor shower/toilet facilities and there was no water left at the finish and I wasn't that slow to be near the end.
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Laurence Calver
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Poor organisation of water at end of race
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013