Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Fenland 10

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (105 votes).

91 to 100 of 105 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last

2005 race reviewed by: Mark Cozens
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Nice run, pity showers not working
Date of review: October 30, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
 

2005 race reviewed by: Chris Smith
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Nice fast run for club runners really.
Date of review: October 30, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Tony Britt
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good, fast flat course. Ideal for beginners.
Date of review: October 30, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: FG
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: PBtastic
In full: Really enjoyable, well organised race. Fast course that could be a nightmare on a windy day, as Vitalstatistix says. If not, though one to definitely mark up on the diary as possible 10-miler PB attempt.
Date of review: November 12, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Windy Miller
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Cannot find the results anywhere on the internet
In full: Enjoyed the race as Idid a PB.Running out of water at the finish was not good.
Date of review: November 4, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Vitalstatistix
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: On a windy day, this would be a very tough race. With not a breath of wind, however, 2004 was a VERY fast 10 miler indeed. Two flyovers break up what is otherwise an extremely flat course.
Date of review: November 2, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%

In short: Well organised and friendly.
In full: A shame about the water running out at the end. Otherwise excellent organisation. Could have done with a marshal at the rear of the start to slow traffic down.
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Jenni Egmore
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Good race to get pb. Shame about water running out at finish - but lots of late entries. Definitely do it again
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Wobbly Jogger
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Nice course, well marshalled, excellent directions.
In full: negatives, poor shower/toilet facilities and there was no water left at the finish and I wasn't that slow to be near the end.
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Laurence Calver
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Poor organisation of water at end of race
Date of review: November 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last
Spacer image

  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
  • Congratulations Team Target 26.2!
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Start Fitness - discount footwear and clothing
ah... achilles heel
Millet Sports
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013