Fenland 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (105 votes). 2005 race reviewed by: Mark Cozens
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Nice run, pity showers not working Date of review: October 30, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Chris Smith
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Nice fast run for club runners really. Date of review: October 30, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tony Britt
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good, fast flat course. Ideal for beginners. Date of review: October 30, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: FG
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: PBtastic In full: Really enjoyable, well organised race. Fast course that could be a nightmare on a windy day, as Vitalstatistix says. If not, though one to definitely mark up on the diary as possible 10-miler PB attempt. Date of review: November 12, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Windy Miller
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Cannot find the results anywhere on the internet In full: Enjoyed the race as Idid a PB.Running out of water at the finish was not good. Date of review: November 4, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Vitalstatistix
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: On a windy day, this would be a very tough race. With not a breath of wind, however, 2004 was a VERY fast 10 miler indeed. Two flyovers break up what is otherwise an extremely flat course. Date of review: November 2, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% |
In short: Well organised and friendly. In full: A shame about the water running out at the end. Otherwise excellent organisation. Could have done with a marshal at the rear of the start to slow traffic down. Date of review: November 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Jenni Egmore
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good race to get pb. Shame about water running out at finish - but lots of late entries. Definitely do it again Date of review: November 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Wobbly Jogger
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Nice course, well marshalled, excellent directions. In full: negatives, poor shower/toilet facilities and there was no water left at the finish and I wasn't that slow to be near the end. Date of review: November 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Laurence Calver
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Poor organisation of water at end of race Date of review: November 1, 2004
|

| |