Muscular Dystrophy Bury 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (111 votes). 2006 race reviewed by: Damo 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent race, shame about the head wind from mile 10 and the hills at 9 and 18. Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Mark Beagley
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: 1st time at Bury,will be back. Thanx for a good event and well done. Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Fenrunner
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Superb organisation and a testing pre-London course In full: I thought I'd need crampons to get up that hill at 9 miles. Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: kim masson
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very well organised and friendly event unlike the two very unfriendly "moderate" climbs Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: grecian 2000
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not all of East Anglia is flat! Great testing event with the icy cold wind and those hills to test your mettle! In full: Returned after 2005's Siberian experience thinking it would be somewhat easier this year. Although it was v. cold again, the sun shone for most of the time. However, a brutal headwind seemed to be following me around for the bulk of the race, and those hills at 9 and 18miles thought they would join the party to finish me off. After taking 30mins after the race to regain my speech and co-ordination, I can summarise what a fantastic event this is: Well organised Park and Ride before and afterwards; Luxurious toilets (with background music and real towels!!); Friendly runners - although being the sole representive from my club, I had no shortage of other people to talk with before, and to compare heartbreaking tales with afterwards; Marshals were wonderful - receive great encouragement from them all which got me round; The most efficient baggage retrieval ever - one person call your number as you limped in and the bag was on the table waiting! With it being so cold - this was what was needed to get back into warm clothes. Thanks to Paul and everyone else involved in making this a great event and I'll be definately back in 2007! Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: JANINE7
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hills nd Wind!! In full: Ive been having nightmares about this one for weeks but really glad I went for it - my aim just get round and the hills are really not that bad after doing Watford a few weeks ago!! Very windy in places but nice to see a bit of sunshine and som every friendly people shame no where warm to wait pre race took me 6 miles to thaw out!! Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2004 race reviewed by: Colchester Coyote
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent preparation for London, plan to run again in 2006 Date of review: September 25, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: jd
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nicely undulating and cold again! Date of review: March 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Sirius303
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Undulating...........! Date of review: March 5, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Matt Crumpler
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Hilly and challenging course (felt like crying at 9 & 18 miles) but beautiful scenery and good orgaisation. Date of review: March 1, 2005
|

| |