South London 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (98 votes). | 91 to 98 of 98 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
2009 race reviewed by: Yvonne Dyson
 | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: November 15, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Milltown Runner
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Mixed terrain, road, narrow pavement and then cross-country. But a friendly affair In full: Not sure why this course is so close the the Wimbledon 10K one, an altogether more established race. A S London 10K could be more in proper S London but this was fine. The car users of SW19 were largely impatient and this race would benefit from road closures. The last 1km run on a bog of a common was a shame Date of review: November 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: PaulieJ
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Decent local race. Hope ti become a regular event In full: Despite my fears, not badly organised at all by Energized. Long queues for loos though, and not much in the way of atmosphere or entertainment but still an enjoyable morning. Got off almost on time for a romp around fairly quiet Wimbledon back streets. Highlight was a killer two-part hill halfway - even worse than the Audi's Wimbledon Hill ordeal. In the final stages there was another cruel twist - an element of making-up-the-distance when, almost within sight of the finish, we were directed around the block. Then it was a muddy splash across the Common for the last 1k. Along the way there was enthusiastic marshalling and not too many impatient drivers. Ran a decent time, despite the hills, mud and water, which always adds to the satisfaction. Nice goodies and medal to round off the feelgood factor. Date of review: November 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by:
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: November 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Erica Redfern
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good event. Well organised. Not sure why we had to run on the boggy common rather than roads on the last 1km Date of review: November 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: jogalog
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Had a great time and I'd definitely do it again Date of review: November 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Zebede
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Quick Date of review: November 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Fair weather runner
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, fast-ish 10k, despite squelchy conditions. Date of review: November 15, 2009
|

| |