Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Reading Half Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (1085 votes).

1081 to 1085 of 1085 ratingsPage: First | -10 | 101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  

2004 race reviewed by: neil miles 2
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: enjoyed the stadium fininsh but did not like the last 2 miles,could have better organisation at the finish
Date of review: January 27, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
0
 

2004 race reviewed by: 22LGM
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
20%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Sort the finish out, herding us all through a 10ft gap, and then making us walk against all the stupid people with bikes and prams trying to meet up with runners
Date of review: January 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: cheesemuncher!!
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
20%
Value
 
20%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: 2003=worst start ever 2004=worst finnish ever
Date of review: January 18, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2003 race reviewed by: sean reed
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: well organised. with good support most of the way around. couple hills not too bad though
Date of review: December 4, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2003 race reviewed by: Big6.1
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
20%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: The start was a fiasco, but once it got going very enjoyable
Date of review: October 25, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: First | -10 | 101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  
Spacer image

  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
  • Congratulations Team Target 26.2!
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Millet Sports
Runners Need
Start Fitness - discount footwear and clothing
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013