Reading Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (1085 votes). 2004 race reviewed by: neil miles 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: enjoyed the stadium fininsh but did not like the last 2 miles,could have better organisation at the finish Date of review: January 27, 2005
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: 22LGM
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 20% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Sort the finish out, herding us all through a 10ft gap, and then making us walk against all the stupid people with bikes and prams trying to meet up with runners Date of review: January 19, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: cheesemuncher!!
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: 2003=worst start ever 2004=worst finnish ever Date of review: January 18, 2005
|
2003 race reviewed by: sean reed
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised. with good support most of the way around. couple hills not too bad though Date of review: December 4, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Big6.1
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The start was a fiasco, but once it got going very enjoyable Date of review: October 25, 2004
|

|