Woodhall Spa 10KHere's how RW members rated this race (219 votes). 2009 race reviewed by: Shaggy.
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fast course, well organised race. Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Sarah Trowsdale
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fantastically flat course, good for getting a PB. More female toilets would be good ! Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mitch1988
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well run woodhall 10k Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ged Forster
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Once again, really well organised event. Perhaps a need to arrange runners at the start by expected finishing time to avoid early congestion. e Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Rickster
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Once again the organisers have done a tremendous job. Excellent race that keeps on getting a bigger field every year. Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Scott S
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Enjoyable run around country lanes In full: Wasn't 100% sure where the start was but just followed some others and found it. We lined up before the lead car and wheelchair athletes had got through so had to part for them. A little bit congested for the first mile but then things spread out and it was far easier to run at your chosen pace. Not sure why they had an early water station (plastic / polystyrene cups) and it was raining anyway so not overly hot thankfully. Nice finish in Jubilee Park with subdued crowds lining the road up to the finish. No problems with chip return or getting a medal / bottle of water. Car park was easy to exit along a single lane road that others (locals?) decided to use in the opposite direction. Plenty of friendly marshalls.
Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: MARK NORTON 5
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Ideal for a first 10K race- well organised Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Carl Cousens
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: flat, easy course in the countryside Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mike Burgess 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: June 7, 2009
|
2008 race reviewed by: Jon Smith 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Very fat race definatly PB potential In full: Despite narrow start, this was a very good, well organised race, and hard to find too many faults Date of review: June 8, 2008
|

| |