Silverstone Grand Prix 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (315 votes). 2010 race reviewed by: gotnokit
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great organisation & welcoming.
Date of review: May 17, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: ElDel
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: May 17, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Long-Shanks
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great venue, with good PB potential
In full: Always good organisation and atmosphere, but seriously what is the point of chip timing but no timing maps at the start?
Date of review: May 17, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Debbie Groom
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: May 17, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Nikki Emerson 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: My favourite race venue of the year, really welcoming for wheelchair athletes.
Date of review: May 17, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Liam Dawson
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really enjoyed the race, I was warned that it could be fairly boring but I found it was tough enough so I had to concentrate on the running . Very well organised!!!!!
Date of review: May 17, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Andrew Dockar
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised, did this for the 4th year running. Just pray it isnt windy!
Date of review: May 17, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Cobblers Mark
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well Done Again Silston.
In full: Another great race organised by Silston. Good numbers always turn out and a fast course which has always brought me a PB.
Echo the starting issue, I didn't realise there was no starting mat but only a minor. Organisation was superby as always.
Date of review: May 14, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Joanna Hughes
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good choice for a first ever race, well-organised and not intimidating for beginners.
In full: The whole atmosphere was really good. It appeared to be well-organised. I was very nervous as it was my first race and found the support and encouragment of Marshalls round the track to be superb. I look forward to doing more races and hopefully next year I will improve on my pb.
Date of review: May 7, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Andrew R1gby
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Overall a good race that I would do again.
In full: As my first 10k (and only my second race) I found it very well organised. Positives: Parking was simple, tag collection very organised and leaving the site was a doddle. Negatives: The start line wasn't that well marked, disappointingly there was little space for spectators (after dragging my family along) and once away from the start there was no atmosphere, just runners. Although the course was not flat it still allowed consistant mile splits so good for PBs.
I would definately do this again, well done Silson Joggers : )
Date of review: May 7, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
