Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Leeds Abbey Dash 10k

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (270 votes).

101 to 110 of 270 ratingsPage: First | -10 | 11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  | +10 | Last

2006 race reviewed by: Dennispotter
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
20%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: Too many entrants -impossible to overtake- really bad round the abbey. I reckon it cost me 2 minutes - my next race was a lot faster. Very squashed at the end
Date of review: March 18, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
 

2006 race reviewed by: Joanne Waddington
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Got a PB(!) but don't think the course, particularly the start, is suitable for so many entrants
Date of review: December 2, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: NorthernExile
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Poor Organisation at start - and MORE RUNNERS = MORE TOILETS needed!!! Remember this ...
Date of review: December 2, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: sylvanette
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: I wouldn't call it a beginner-friendly race...
In full: As an official plodder, my only goal was to finish without walking, which I did. I gave my estimated time before the race as 90 minutes, and that is pretty much where I came in! But for all the talk of this being beginner-friendly, I was VERY near the back of the race, barely anyone behind me, no one walking and felt pretty dejected at the whole experience. The marshals were lovely but traffic was opened up before I was hardly halfway around, which made me feel very rushed and as if my slowness was getting in the way. I did, however, get offered water at the abbey, and I take it that others missed this? No water at the finish though. Agree with others about the sad toilet situation. In summary, I would not recommend this race to beginners unless you are already pretty fast and pretty fit, or not easily intimidated!
Date of review: December 1, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: JamesDavey 2
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: A very beginner friendly race and an excellent corse for anyone, runners ot non-runners
Date of review: December 1, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Martin Ison
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A bit confused at the start. timimg slots not well signed
In full: As previous review the roads were opened and it made life difficult for people.
Date of review: November 30, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Katwoman
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: We had a lovely time but . . .
In full: My sister and I were doing this as it was local to her and we fancied doing a race together. No pretensions to PBs or anything. A bit crowded at the start but we were at the back so it didn't matter. It's a fast course, the weather was perfect and it was great to have the Abbey as a marker. However, they opened the roads again about 50 minutes or so into the race so on the way back so slow people like us were funnelled into the cycle lane (with cars charging past) or onto the pavement. Not fun.
Date of review: November 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Ian1
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Good mostly flat course for a fast time, did my fastest for this year. As per other comments could do with water-station half way round. Scenery not interesting out of the town, but is nice round the Abbey.
Date of review: November 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: henrynicholson78
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
20%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Very Poor Organisation
In full: I am just saying what alot of other people have been saying but I want to say it anyway. They start the race on the smallest street around. Why can't they start it one along as it is a road that doesn't really go anywhere because it leads to the park square one way system. That would avoid the problems of milling around wellington street. Or even in the entrance to the crowne plaza complex, that is very big and could easily cater for the number of people.

Water would be nice but that doesn't bother me although I didn't see a single distance marker.

The finish line could be made much wider, the headrow is a large road and the pavement there is massive. I ran into someone at the finish because it had become so congested.

Finally the queuing for tshirts was ridiculous, there was no attempt to stop non runners getting in there so it just became really congested, why not have a couple of lines of fencing so people can be shepherded through chip drop off and tshirt collection and then if they want to loiter they can do it outside the museum.

I spent most of the race trying to get past people but I do think it's impressive to close the kirkstall road.

All in I would do it again but I think a bit of common sense needs to be applied and they should give consideration to the ideas that people on places such as this forum contribute.

Date of review: November 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Jamie Stewart 4
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Disappointing
In full: I was disappointed by this race. It was very dull and felt much longer than 10K! The start was very disorganised and it was impossible to see where you should start for your predicted race time. As usual with most of these races, there was a distinct lack of adequate toilet facilities. A small row of portable loos for 4,000 people just isn't sufficient! There was a huge queue for the toilets and I, like may others was still in the loo when the race started! I would have expected a water station at the half way point in Kirkstall Abbey. Also rather annoying that they ran out of size small t-shirts. Despite the fact this is supposed to be a PB course, I did 5 minutes slower than my 10K PB (which was a cross-country hilly run!). I think the fact it felt so long and dull contributed to my lack of enthusiasm on the day. Would think twice before doing it again.
Date of review: November 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: First | -10 | 11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  | +10 | Last
Spacer image

  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
  • Congratulations Team Target 26.2!
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Millet Sports
Runners Need
Start Fitness - discount footwear and clothing
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013