Mornington Chasers Regent's Park Winter 10K 6 Race Grand Prix SeriesHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (106 votes). | 101 to 106 of 106 ratings | Page: First | -10 | 11 |
2006 race reviewed by: Marc Peters
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent marshals, clearly signed course and markers at every KM. Excellent race. Incidently my GPS measured 10.02KM ;-)
Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: runtilyoudrop
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Reliable
Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Sussex Runner (NLR)
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good race with excellent value especially for London. Just seeemed to lack a bit of atmosphere but probably cos its a monthly thing. Good if you want a regular time trial to measure your progress. I couldnt really ask for anything more.
Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: A Morris
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: good but the old route was much prettier
Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: GoldStar (M.)
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good race, well marshalled & great for beginners
In full: I too have doubts about the course length (my Polar footpod came up with 10.3km) but all that means is I'll be faster over a more accurate course. The doubts over the distance doesn't ruin the run though which is pretty cool despite the 3 lap format. Can't fault the organisation or the marshalling though - thanks for turning out for us!
Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: SteveC1975
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good Race, great crowds/marshalls and banana's, not sure course length accurate though
In full: Good race, enjoyed it, great location, laps can be a bit boring but this one seemed ok, Not sure race distance is 100% accurate tho, My Garmin is always very reliable in measured distance races to the nearest 10 metres, this race turned up as being 6.48 Miles/10.42 K, other people with GPS monitors reported similar from 6.4 to 6.55! Who knows whose right!
Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
