Gloucester 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (137 votes). 2006 race reviewed by: kate humphrey
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: beautiful day, beautiful part of the country, my first 20-brilliant FLM preparation! Date of review: March 8, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Arthur Zammit 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Perfect run for marathon build-up In full: Enjoyed the course,ran a fast pace but it was a bit spoilt by lack of water and only given another t-shirt, would rater have drinks and snacks instead because they are useful at the end of a 20 mile run, but hope to be back next year otherwise. Date of review: March 8, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Pineapple
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good pre marathon race, only complaint being lack of water at the finish Date of review: March 8, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: MAUREEN P Fearnside
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: nice scenery, enjoyable atmosphere Date of review: March 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Father A
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: An enjoyable race. The two loop aspect was not a problem. more support would help. Date of review: March 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Sam Skennel
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great weather, good scenery, good company too In full: Disappointed with the post run organisation of refreshments - those finishing in the second half the runners struggled to get water. Otherwise, good stuff - thanks!! Date of review: March 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Jillthepill
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well marshalled, good course to stretch you mentally and physically. Efficient organistion and seemed a friendly bunch. Lovely sunshine! Date of review: March 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Kim Rye 4
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well Organised In full: Nice peeople Water stations were well marshalled Nice cup of tea afterwards Date of review: March 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Laura Croker
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: LOVED IT In full: What a beautiful day it was! A really pretty, well marshaled race - brilliant pre-London race. Drinks stations well manned and at the right times. Really encouraging team at the end. The only bad thing is they ran out of water on the finish line when I arrived at 2 hrs 55 s. But thank you to the organisers, it was brilliant. Date of review: March 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: middleroad
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well-organised, friendly marshalls, great scenery - and well done on the glorious weather! Date of review: March 6, 2006
|

| |