Bath Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (1133 votes). 2004 race reviewed by: IAN FRANCIS
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Organisation shambolic. STILL waiting for merchandise, no repllies to emails, results wrongly recorded
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 20% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% |
In short: I ran 3 events organised by the city of bath in 2003.This was poor Unfortunately it was the mostly badly organised race I have run, with a disappointly featureless industrial course. The hilly 10 is fantastic. I won't be running the half again.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% |
In short: Poor organisation from start to finish- took ages to confirm my entry; numbers fiasco on day; still no pre-ordered race merchandise received two weeks after the event; kids on lucozade station were mucking around; no goody bag / banana....
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% |
In short: Ruined by the weather but a good PB potential course. Slightly over priced for what you get but a good excuse for a weekend in Bath. I'll probably be back next year!
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Aspiration Kat
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Difficult to get into as all the spaces get filled within 3 to 4 weeks
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Pat, the mild mannered janitor
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: old geezer
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Very popular - apply early -flat fast course
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Angi
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hugely over rated event .Deary route, terrible value for money £20+ in 2004. Organisation isn't great and doesn't compare with Plymouth.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: skid
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Sells itself
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
