Wellingborough Multi-Terrain 5KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (131 votes). 2006 race reviewed by: Spitz (in the face of adversity)
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great fun - especially that hill. In full: Really well organised, good variety of surfaces to run on, fantastic (if outrageous) commentary - highly recommended. Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: old balance
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great fun, excellent organisation, good quality mud, shoes needed to be bathed later! Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: MALCOLM BRANCH 2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: AN ENJOYABLE RUN Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Rob Billings
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Mud :-) In full: The two guys face down in a puddle gave me something to laugh about on the way round! Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: simon hollis
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: very muddy - great fun, not pb material but great running through the woods on a cold fresh january morning Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Fruit Case
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Brilliant day out and very good organisation. Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Greg Smith 6
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very enjoyable Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Mike Austin
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Muddy! In full: A nice course with a good mix of surfaces. I did have to laugh at the two guys that collided on the first hill climb in the mud and who both then ended up face first in it! An enjoyable race and am looking forward to Round 2 Date of review: January 22, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Lynne Harvey
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: My first race, very beginner friendly. Will do it again In full: . Date of review: April 14, 2005
|
2000 race reviewed by: sadman
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Ran in 2005, thought well organised, great marshalls, friendly people, very beginner friendly Date of review: March 2, 2005
|

| |