Southport MAD DOG Seaside 10K RACE NOW FULLHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (138 votes). 2011 race reviewed by: gammyknee
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Brilliant run even though the wind was blowing!!
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: One City, One Club
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Who let the dogs out?!!
In full: Really enjoyed this, lovely scenic flat course.
Great turnout by runners and supporters alike.
Loads of marshals’ on the course, great organisation all round. Great medal and t-shirt.
All round bargain, great to see so much money going to charity, hope this is a regular event and doesn’t too get too big.
Well done to all involved, see you next year
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Lauren Mayot 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised and friendly
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Russell Nimbus
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race, Great course.
In full: Did anyone else mention it was VERY WINDY today? Well I guess you can't blame the race organisers for that one! What an excellent race. Big thanks to everyone who made it possible and I'll see you next year! Fantastic!
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Andy Hamilton 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I did the MAD DOG today and thoroughly enjoyed it. The course was was really good and nice and flat, if a little breezy for the first 5k. The organisers did a great job and the whole event seemed to go very smoothly. A very friendly atmosphere 10/10
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: ste hughes
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Very well organised
In full: well done to all involved great race
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: chosp
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: cheeky little number
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: fat thighs
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Hope its back again in 2012
In full: Hopefully this race will become a yearly event. Plenty of smiling marshalls, good flat course well marked out and chip timing. Although not traffic free it was never a problem.
The wind was fierce for the first 5k but glad rain held off.
Well done to all those who put the time and effort into organising this new event. Compared to the other 10K in Southport I think this is a better course (no loops) and a better price.
Will be back next year
Date of review: February 6, 2011
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
