Wargrave 10K  Here's how RW members rated this race (150 votes). 2005 race reviewed by: S3oB
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised all round. Testing hill around 4k that kills the PB potential but makes it a course worthy of a county championship event.
Date of review: June 13, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Twink
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great organisation, picturesque course & a t-shirt that fits !
Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: NoMoreSpeedwork
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice location, gently undulating, organisation good but with irritating lapses (e.g. cyclists allowed past water station between runners and table!)
Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Jamie Ashton
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very good race. Extra water stations were good on a warm morning.
Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Tim A
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Scenic course - basically up a hill and down again. Hope it is cooler this year. Well organised with lots of space at start/finish
Date of review: January 13, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Anders Mac
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Keith Scudamore
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: NoMoreSpeedwork
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hilly course, great atmosphere
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good wide start line allowing elite and good club runners a good start.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A great local 10Km race where I got a PB. Lovely countryside and a nice mix of people (even if I was nearer to the back).
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
