Barnsley 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (185 votes). 2004 race reviewed by: troffer
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great turnout and mixed ability field Date of review: November 15, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Galli
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good day enjoyed it, apart from the start. Date of review: November 15, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Torque Steer
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: challenging course further defining undulating In full: I'm sure any minor glitches would be sorted out if run next year Date of review: November 15, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Andrew Shaw 5
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Last two miles positively cruel! In full: Enjoyed the race though the start was very confusing. Lack of water at the end the only negative. Date of review: November 15, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Hoodedman
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: £6, a carrier bag with a medal and nothing else,and no water at the end!!! In full: organisation and value for money needs working on, good overall course Date of review: November 15, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Stormin Norman
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised race on a scenic route but 'undulating' means hilly! Date of review: November 14, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Charles Sandilands
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great Date of review: November 14, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: SpeedyGonzaliz
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good local race. New PB for me so I'm well pleased. Date of review: November 14, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: steve stewardson
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Chaotic parking In full: Is this the first one run in Royston? There were enough marshalls on the course but it wasn't traffic free by any means. Coke oven atmosphere reminded my of work! Date of review: November 14, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Barnsley Runner
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A friendly local 10k organised by runners for runners. In full: Over 30 marshalls on the course. People had been advised that parking at the leisure centre would be limited and to use the numerous side streets.
We value constructive comments so we can try and make the race a better experience next year.
Thanks to people who have made them. Date of review: November 14, 2004
|

| |