The Terminator 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (326 votes). 2008 race reviewed by: blobby
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great race, thoroughly enjoyed it and will definately be back!
In full: This race was such fun. The hills, mud and water only made it better. The atmosphere was great, the marshalls as usual did a great job and fellow competitors were really supportive and encouraging, especially the man who convinced me to put in a bit of a sprint at the finish.
Date of review: February 24, 2008
|
|
2008 race reviewed by: Stuart Cranfield
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great countryside, good atmosphere - with mud, water and hills into the excellent mix of terain!
In full: First time I have done this event and it lived up to the reviews. A great setting, good organisation and well signed and marshalled. No distance markers but that might have been more depressing than helpfull. If you want a good multi terrain challenge this would take some beating, the closest I know of would be the full monty but that is definitely shorter. I'd recommend it, and will hopefully be back again next year.
Date of review: February 24, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: paul salmon
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: As ever great fun,, what more fun could you have on a sunday morning.
Date of review: February 24, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Phil Henley 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: excellent race
In full: First time running this race and I wasn't dissapointed, organisation and marshalls excellent, also supporters great.
Could have done with more toilets as quite a long queue, even with getting there early.
Great cakes.
Date of review: February 24, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Nicole Walters
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: great fun
Date of review: February 24, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Mathew Webb
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Excellent race although easier than the Rough and Tumble 10 due to the considerably drier conditions. Marshalling was exceptional and atmosphere was good
Date of review: February 24, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Brendan O'reilly
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent and challenging experience
In full: A very challenging race with a whole mix of obstacles along the way. A very enjoyable experience and a good training session for the London marathon. I thought the organisation was very good.
Date of review: February 24, 2008
|
2007 race reviewed by: Pilgrim wayne
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Barking mad race for barking mad people
In full: You know you are in for one hell-of-a run within the first mile and it just gets better/worse after that. Don't do this if you are scared of heights or are agrophobic. A very good atmosphere and well worth the effort. Will be there for the next one.
Date of review: November 10, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Lee Harman
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Happy days!!! tough but well worth the journey and getting up
Date of review: April 2, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Gary the Snail
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: I thought the R & T was tough enough
Date of review: March 21, 2007
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
