Lordshill 10kHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (64 votes). | 11 to 20 of 64 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2009 race reviewed by: Dickie 4
 | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: |
In short: Friendly low key event good for checking out race readyness for distance race
Date of review: June 28, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Laura Tomei
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hot Hot Hot!
In full: A very good race, quite quick, some uphills and downhills, clockwork marchalling, overall A+. Well done!
Date of review: June 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Terence Earney
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A well organised local friendly race
In full: A very hot and humid day, which I feel made times slower than for previous years. This was my slowest 10k ever.
This is a very well organised race, with friendly, enthusiastic marshals. I will certainly be back next year, and also intend to enter the 10 miler, which is also an excellent race.
Date of review: June 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: ValeS
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good friendly local race. Good for training, very well marshalled and VERY generous prizes, thank you!
Date of review: June 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Artie
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised with plenty of enthusiastic marshalls.
In full: My first time. A warm day and more undulation than I expected.Very well organised and a nice sized field.Well done.
Date of review: June 28, 2009
|
2008 race reviewed by: Nigel Beecham
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well marshalled for a smooth no complication race. Good value, well organised
Date of review: July 3, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Biscuits
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Well organised
In full: The organisation of this race is very good particularly considering it is a relatively small race. I got my PB for the second year running. It is a fairly fast course but more hills than I had remembered!
Date of review: June 30, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Terence Earney
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A very enjoyable local race
In full: I was disappointed with my race time, which was nearly 1.5 mins. slower than last year. I put it down to the humidity, and windy conditions.
This is a very friendly race, but also competitive. The Marshalls were excellent, as usual, and the organisation was very professional. I will certainly be back again next year, and will also run the 10 mile later in the year.
Date of review: June 30, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Mark Campion
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The Marshalls are fantastic
In full: This race is very well organised and marshalled, they really seem to make the extra effort. Shame about the gates not being open as this could have caused a few issues but luckily the couple of slower runners coming the opposite way were more than happy to wait for us to come through. Good race with some genuinely nice and friendly people organising it.
Date of review: June 30, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Grumpydirtbag
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised pleasant race.
In full: well organised. weather made it more enjoyable than last year.quite flat so PB potential. I beat last years time so I am happy. Not much support except for marshalls. pleasant morning.
Date of review: June 30, 2008
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
