British 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (606 votes). | 11 to 20 of 30 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2004 race reviewed by: Wrinty
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Organisers have taken note of negative criticism in earlier years. In full: Good course around central London and well supported, a few hairpin bends and the twisting nature of the course through Whitehall will make PB's hard to come by - but there again the crowd support and Union Jacks may lift you to a PB. Date of review: December 1, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: i hate hills
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well worth running In full: I love this race, but if you want a fast time then get to the front of the pack ASAP as it gets a bit crowded on the course. Date of review: October 23, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Pel Boy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good sights. In full: Get to the front for a good time. Next year will be special Date of review: October 4, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Mark Saunderson
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: What a shame. Potential to be great, but let down by absolutely terrible organisation. And next year's race is £10 more expensive than this year's! Date of review: October 4, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Joanne Clark
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Disappointing In full: Very expensive and no goody bag at the end (although by paying for 'Gold' entry we had been promised one). Bit haphazard at the beginning, tripping over those walking. Date of review: September 15, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Denz
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Organising desperately needs sorting out In full: The potential is there, However the negatives are vast, bad start line, no water at the finish, medal was a joke, silver finish was flaking off when i got it, 1/2 a mile walk back to the kit pickup area. There is more but enough said. Date of review: September 15, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Mike Graney
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very good. Plenty of water, unlike what I was led to believe Date of review: September 7, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: The Other Man
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not *that* scenic but worth it for the large race atmosphere Date of review: September 3, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: _Kieren
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Worth doing once for the scenery perhaps In full: Start was badly organised - you'll be tripping over people for at least the first 3km Date of review: September 2, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Claire Speed
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A good run, despite the organisation. In full: At least there was water this year, not that I trusted there to be and I brought my own. It needs chips and start filtering and then it will be a smashing event. And no cotton T-shirts - what a waste of time! Date of review: September 1, 2004
|

| |