Broadland Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (111 votes). 2010 race reviewed by: Mark Hamblin 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Glorious day, great scenery and friendly atmosphere In full: What a fantastic day - felt like the first day of spring! Great scenery and friendly support from the marshalls and locals. Worth the 1 1/2 hr drive! It might have been the sun and scenery but I didn't find the hills that bad! Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Nicola Uglow
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: really enjoyable, geat scenery especially in the sunshine Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: 1e-runner
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Nice scenic run, couple of tough hills towards the end. In full: Great organisation, great atmosphere, superb marshalls, and i got a PB. Will be back. Watch out for those sharp rises towards the end. Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Mark Ring
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Yet again a great race - cannot fault anything In full: I can only agree with the other comments - a great race, superbly organised, fantastic marshalls, brilliant weather again and as others have mentioned, wonderful cakes to sample at the end ! My only gripe, which has nothing to do with the race itself, is the amazing selfishness of one of the very early finishers (possibly even the race winner ?) who decided to run into oncoming runners at about mile 12 when we were on the path, with parked cars along the side of the road, with nowhere else to run ! How selfish can you get - I hope if he or one of his club collegaues reads this he will be suitably embarrassed ! Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Thomas Lincoln-kemp
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Superb countryside, with an unexpected number of hills. Very well organised and well marshalled/signposted - I'll be back for next year. And the medal was classy Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: thebezza
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Beautiful Scenary, great organisation - really enjoyed it! In full: Great organisation - thanks Norwich Road Runners, and some of the friendliest and happiest marshalls i've experienced. My first time at this race, car parking was well organised - no queues for toilets - fantastic cakes, and to top it off a glorious day for a lovely run in the "Undulating" Norfolk countryside!! Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Ian Hacon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: lovely picturesque. more hilly than it looks for Norfolk Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: pete101
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: blessed with lots of sunshine, an excellent half, lovely cake afterwards too, thanks Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Spoons.
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great event. Perfect weather. Nice scenery. A few challenging hills (for Norfolk). Helpful marshalls. Fantastic cake selection at the end. What more could you ask for? Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Abrahaj
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Where did that hill come from at mile 11? In full: My first ever organised event and the first time ever running over 9 miles - and those last 4 did hurt a bit, especially that drag up the hill at mile 11!! Well organised event and a nice sunny day for a run round the Norfolk countryside!! I may well be back next year, as long as my knees last that long. Date of review: March 21, 2010
|

| |