Broadland Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (111 votes). | 11 to 20 of 30 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2009 race reviewed by: daza smiffy
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: not that flat but still got a PB :-) In full: well organised, friendly event. Glorious scenery on the hottest day so far nice spring sunshine for watching tho. Some challenging hills i have to say specially at mile 11 - "who said Norfolk was flat?" was a much used saying for the day at the post run chat. plus i got a PB which always makes for a good race. Date of review: March 16, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Crazylegs
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice, mainly flat course. Good organisation Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Steve Gibbs 4
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Who knew Norfolk was hilly Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Matt Neville
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Warm race with more hills than expected but enjoyable and well organised. Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Robert Dowsett
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Scenic, with a couple of hills 'out and back' course Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mark Ring
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Superbly organised, challenging course, a great race. In full: Superbly organised, challenging course, a great race. Everyone has commented on the hills, but the great weather helped make it a great event, and I even managed a PB ! Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Duane Daugherty 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised. Marshalls and people manning the drinks stations were very supportive. A fair few hills but nothing too bad. The first warm weather run of the year. I'll be back next year. Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Puddle Jumper
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great day, great atmosphere. Look forward to next year Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: chargey
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good course, race In full: I moved over to flat norfolk from the midlands last year. Where did all those hills come from? Good course, great marshalls well organised, nice day. Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: steve allen 2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: It's definitely not flat but still quickish. A really nice race and all the competitors seem to enjoy themselves. I rarely race on the road nowadays (legs won't take it) but have done this race 4 times in the last 5 years. Date of review: March 15, 2009
|

| |