Stoke Stampede 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (19 votes). | 11 to 19 of 19 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2008 race reviewed by: The Green Fairy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Friendly race in the countryside, well worth doing. Date of review: December 26, 2008
|
|
2008 race reviewed by: DANNY PAINTER
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good Boxing day run, well organised with a friendly feel. Date of review: December 26, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Tom Craggs 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great Boxing Day race In full: Really enjoyed this and would definately do it again. Very supportive locals, well organised and pretty compettiive/fast field whilst still being supportive for beginners. Well done to the organisers. Date of review: December 26, 2008
|
2005 race reviewed by: Matt the Brum
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised and friendly. Good course on very quiet roads. Excellent way to run off some of that turkey. Had the longest presentation of prizes I've ever known at a race:) Date of review: January 4, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Matt Morgan
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I would recommend this race. In full: Small field, well organised, and relatively flat. What's not to like about this race. I suspect it will grow even more in popularity over the next few years. Date of review: January 2, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Speedy Swiss
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A very nice and rural race with a friendly and cheering local crowd. It was certainly well worth eating a bit less Xmas turke and to brave the cold. Date of review: December 28, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Will Owen
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent Race, great way to clear the xmas head... Will be making it part of my xmas every year Date of review: December 30, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Peter Jones 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% |
In short: Pleasant way to run-off xmas dinner Date of review: December 30, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Haruki
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A small countryside race, nothing spectactular, but a good day out! In full: I really enjoyed it - friendly marshalls and spectators, not too hilly, good pubs (and a PB). Lots of fast club runners, which could either be daunting or inspiring! I would definitely do this again. Date of review: December 26, 2004
|

| |