Silverstone Grand Prix 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (315 votes). | 11 to 20 of 23 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2005 race reviewed by: LooneyGirl
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race, great organisation and the best toilet facilities around Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Hellmole
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 20% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Dull but fast In full: Course fast but tedious - not convinced about the spacing of the mile markers. No drinks station. Not even so much as a banana when you finished - had to hunt for the water. No motivation for the slower runners who must have finished in the dark. However, a good pb circuit if that is what you are looking for. Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Ming Ming
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: good not sure the distance was right! could have done with k markers Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: MaxMPG
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised race, easy course (and interesting for petrolheads like me) In full: The entry to this race gets larger every year, and deserves to. It's an easy race to just turn up, warm up and run, and the course is self explanatory (but there are friendly marshalls at regular intervals anyway). And you run round the Grand Prix circuit, so you really get to see what Michael Schumacher sees, only 180mph slower... Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Beckilou
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent Race and great organisation Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Runner Martin
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good race, as always and enjoyable event In full: Good value race and the rain held off - just Nice wide track therefore plenty of room for overtaking or being overtaken, just like F1 Well done Silsoe joggers & MKAC Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Funt
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: As always, a thoroughly enjoyable race. In full: When God sets out his annual weather plan, does he look up the date of the Silverstone 10K on the RW website and think to himself, "right, that'll be wind and rain on May 3rd then." I mean, a glorious weekend and the wind and wet descend on Northants almost as if predestined. But seriously, terrific race and one absolutely made for beginners, I think. Like Arnie, I'll be back... Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Hess.
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fantastic experience. Water at halfway would've been good In full: You have to run round this circuit at least once.
The organisation was good, but water at 5K would've been necessary had it been warmer.
Great experience, and will definately be back next year Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: SoVeryTired
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fairly flat, wonderful surface, good atmosphere Date of review: May 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Well organised with encouraging marshals. A memento would have been good. Date of review: May 3, 2005
|

| |