Rough 'n' Tumble 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (285 votes). | 11 to 19 of 19 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2005 race reviewed by: John Blake 3
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Very challenging, but scenery, excellent organisation and professional marshalling made for a fantastic race.
Date of review: January 17, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Gobi
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Mad really mad what a great laugh !!!!!
Date of review: January 17, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: david stares
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very hard challenging run over some very steep hills. For a first time race extremely well organised.
Date of review: January 17, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: BRM
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Beautiful scenery, very challenging off-road course, very good organisation, a great day out in the heartland.
Date of review: January 16, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Stephen Whitehead
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: It was rough and I tumbled. Great community spirit around the whole event.
Date of review: January 16, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Monkey girl
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Where's the ski lift?
In full: Blimey! When they said hills they weren't kidding - Giants Grave was truly a hands and knees job - even the nimblest mountain goat would struggle! Brilliant route, stunning scenery, freakishly lovely weather, totally wrecked trainers and a cake table to die for - it was huge! I had no idea there were so many permutations of fruit cake! Congratulations and Radox all round and I'll be back next year to sample the Victoria sponges.
Date of review: January 16, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: KGB
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tough, lung-bursting, muddy, friendly, inspiring, excellent organisation.
Date of review: January 16, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Girona
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Muddy, slippery and hilly. Fantastic scenery. Extremely tough - limbs are aching now.
Date of review: January 16, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Welsh Alex
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Bigger Hills than expected but made up for by big downhills and cake at finish
In full: Lots of steep ups and downs, Don't think anyone could run up all of them. Rolled down one (literally). Nice sunny day - would have been even more fun in torrential rain !
Date of review: January 16, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
