Cricklade Half Marathon  Here's how RW members rated this race (74 votes). | 11 to 20 of 74 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
2009 race reviewed by: SGQ
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Flat, fast and friendly
In full: I've done this several times now and it's definitey one of my favourite races. The course is flat (there are a couple of very, very slightly uphill bits, but nothing worthy of note) and has real PB potential. The atmosphere is good and the marshalls friendly all the way round. This year it was chip timed without and increase in price (maybe because it was a late decision?), so it was very good value! I'll keep going back!
Date of review: October 8, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: shaun carpenter
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: a very nice race good route see you next year
Date of review: October 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Dan Wymer
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Reasonably flat course gave me my new pb
Date of review: October 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Graeme Martin
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Improves every year
In full: I'm biased because I am local, but this race seems to get a bit better each year. It is fairly inexpensive and this year had electronic timing. The organisation seemed smooth and professional, although the atmosphere only existed at the beginning and end of the race.
Date of review: October 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Gordon Brown 6
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good course and well organised.
In full: All very good indeed. Marshalling very good, although I was worried in the last mile that I was going wrong (partly due to gibbering exhaustion but also not many marhsals/signs). Nice finish area, good to have the hall and well-organised tables at the start. Some fast 10K runners seemed annoyed at half-marathon runners getting in the way after the start but I gather it was the other way round last year. Difficult to get this right unless there's more of a stagger at the start. A good day all round.
Date of review: October 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Peacey
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Quick course, nice route.
In full: Quick course with some inclines but nothing of serious note. Well marshalled apart from the last mile when it could of been a bit better, plenty of water stations.
Much better than the Swindon half which i have run twice, will be back next year.
Date of review: October 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Stupid Is
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A good, well organised & flat half.
Date of review: October 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Barrie Chandler
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very well marshelled and mildly undulating course. Great fun.
Date of review: October 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Anne Rogers
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Friendly, well marshalled, enjoyable run.
Date of review: October 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Martin Glazebrook
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Excellent up there in my Top 5 1/2 Marathon Events
Date of review: October 4, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
