BUPA Great South RunHere's how RW members rated this race (813 votes). | 11 to 20 of 67 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2003 race reviewed by: DMK
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Because of numbers difficult to get a fast time, but the atmosphere was terrific and the number of cheering spectators and bands along the route made the time just fly by, I was running for Leukaemia Research and was not looking for a PB
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
|
2003 race reviewed by: Millie
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: It was my first "big" race and I would definitely do it again!
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: mark harris
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: MUCH LESS CROWDED AND FRIENDLIER THAN GNR
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: jones tina
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: rosemary leiper
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: shame about delay in start again this year - kids race great
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: bunions
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Helen Hogan
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: The organisation is good but the congenstion getting to the start line has delayed the race start in the past. Set off very early.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: RosieMac
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, with a delay to the start to allow runners delayed on trains to arrive. Can be very windy over the last 1.5 miles.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Soo.B.Doo
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Disappointed that there was no chip time. Other than that a fun event.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Spoony
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A cult race this, very pb friendly, better than cousin GNR. Traffic still a problem
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
