2009 PUMA HellRunner: Hell Down South Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (468 votes). | 11 to 20 of 49 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
2005 race reviewed by: Sproingy
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fantastic race! All you could ask for trails, mud, ponds and hellish sand. In full: A good race well organised, the course is challenging but not too tough for the beginners, A nice change to the usual road race. A great goody bag with t-shirt DVD and washing powder! Showers were hot and vwey welcome (if a liitle communal)I have recommended this race to others for next year! Date of review: November 2, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Damien Jones
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fantastic fun, some wading and clambering rather than running at times! In full: A cross country race with a few nice (in hindsight!) twists. Would recommend it to anyone who thinks running is boring. Date of review: November 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Anthony Duthoit
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Too crowded In full: Great race and a long time cleaning up, but no chance of running freely if you start slow, way too crowded. Date of review: October 30, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: limper
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Roll on 2006 In full: Longer course, deeper mud, softer sand, wetter water!! It just gets better and better. For the less competative a good sense of cameraderie emerged from the mud!! Thanks Trailplus. Date of review: October 28, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Chris Washington-Sare
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: 11 miles of madness and mayhem - excellent fun! Date of review: October 28, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Creaky Knees
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Mud Mud And some Deep Goo thrown in for good measure. In full: Bit crowded at the start. Could have done without the barriers to tiptoe round. Thought it was going to be one of those contrived races with nets and climbing walls, but was pleasantly surprised to find some lovely woodland tracks and some stiff sandy hills. Great fun, except for the sand dunes at the end-a bit extreme. Date of review: October 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tom Vamos
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Top fun! Hard work but worth for the smug sense of self-satisfaction at the end. In full: Tiring and hard work to pace yourself not having any distance markers. That aside, one of the most enjoyable races I've done all year and certainly harder than last year. Shame I can't find any pictures of the mud ... that bit was just nuts!! Date of review: October 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Scary Monster
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tough, tough, tough In full: Next year I'm going for the unisex showers only, to hell with the run. Date of review: October 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Bald Patch
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: An absolute belter! Muddy, wet, exhausted - I loved it! Date of review: October 26, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Ed Hare
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Tough, sandy, muddy but so so much fun!! Date of review: October 25, 2005
|

| |