Run Richmond Riverside 10KHere's how RW members rated this race (84 votes). | 11 to 20 of 84 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
2012 race reviewed by: Sher Meekings
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Mud,mud and more mud!
In full: Lovely race through the beautiful Swinley Forest. Hard going in places especially the water! Great atmosphere.
Date of review: November 3, 2012
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: leoma79
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat race, but not enough for a PB due to off-road and muddy route
In full: Well marshalled; muddy race; staggered start was an excellent and smart decision; the the organisation should have pointed out more clearly that off-road shoes are the best option considering the race path(especially in case of rain the day before); initial distance markers were totally wrong; quite expensive entry fee (18.5 £) for a 10k race with no goody bag; beautiful Thames river scenery; very nice and pleasant atmosphere at the start/finish stands.
Date of review: October 30, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Gavlar C
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice Flat, fast race
In full: I've done this a few times, chip timing and a staggered start sort the bunching issues out. Plenty of mud and puddles along the route and slippery in places. Well organised and pleasant marshalls, my only gripe was that the distance markers bore no relation as to the correct distance! 1k came up at 500m 5k was in fact 4k. Other than that a nice morings run!!
Date of review: October 20, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: Matt McDaniel
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good 10k with definite scope for PB
In full: Not sure if all these reviews are for the same race as the 2011 was absolutely flat with 0 hills.
A decent course, although a little narrow in parts early on so PB hunters should make sure they're out in front.
Well worth the entry fee, and nice to have a race on a Saturday morning.
(NB - If I remember correctly the course was not closed, so may bump into the occassional dog walker).
Date of review: August 22, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Julian Teece
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: July 10, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Teacher Paul
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fast, flat and pretty.
In full: Well organised race that would suit PB hunters and beginners alike. Really nice to run the whole route along the Thames, especially on such a nice day. My only gripe would be that the atmosphere was not brilliant (the martials were excellent but every other runner seemed to wearing an iPod and that always reduces the banter along the way!). Oh, and best of all was the sausage sarnie I had at the end. Marvelous!
Date of review: March 24, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: James Bourke
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The hills are challenging especially 3rd time around
In full: Very well organised, great atmosphere, encouraging marshalls. The hills are difficult and you will feel them but all in all a very good race.
Date of review: March 16, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Katrina Chapman
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Fantastic, had a great time, the hills were a killer.
Date of review: March 10, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Nicky O'Connor
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Tough but enjoyable race
In full: I did a 10k in Greenwich park back in 2008 and that took in 2 runs at the hills, this race took in 4 so it was hard going. I enjoyed the challenge, the marshalls were encouraging and the park looked great. Like the Saturday rather the usual Sunday of similar events. Definitely do again, not for beginners.
Date of review: March 10, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: Gavlar C
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice fast Course
Date of review: November 27, 2011
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
