Surrey Tempest 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (59 votes). | 11 to 20 of 23 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2011 race reviewed by: Calum Field
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: May 15, 2011
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: Frin
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: March 16, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: On The Rails
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Intertesting tough run - well organised and good marshalling
In full: Well done to all involved. My concerns for giving this race top marks is that you do run with alot of road traffic hich is off putting along with the camber of the road when away from the airfield. Very good medal and plentyful supply of drinks and energy gels - very generous. Well done Alan and the team
Date of review: March 15, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Alistair Fitzgerald
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race and welcoming. Enjoyed my first 10 miler will be back in October
Date of review: March 15, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Andy Tunstall
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great event! 3rd time for me, and it gets better every time.
In full: Great organisation. Excellent location. Just enough variation in terrain to make it challenging. I will be back in September hoping to slice another 30seconds off my PB! Thanks for a great Sunday morning.
Date of review: March 14, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Lorraine Boberg
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great! Thank you
In full: Had a great time, especially when I was near the end! Hard enough to challenge me, but not so much to put me off. Well organised, good water/ power gel stops, enough loos and very welcoming. Will definitely do again.
Date of review: March 14, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: TONKA BOY
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Thankyou runners!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In full: As one of the four marshalls at the 7 and 17 mile mark i would just like to say how much we also enjoyed the day, we really had fun cheering, encourageing and helping you all have a safe and fun event.
Having so many of you say thankyou is a real feelgood factor in helping out at future events.
We must have had over 95% of you either say thankyou or even give us a thumbs up.
I am also a runner and with probably hundreds of races over the years along with triathlon it is good to try the other side of the fence for a change.
So to each and everyone of you, "WELL DONE" you all did fantastic and "GOOD LUCK" for your next event.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: richard driscoll
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great Organisation, solid medal, quite literally. Really enjoyed it
In full: Cheers for a great event. really enjoyed it.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Gladys M.
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyable course, just enough up and down to make it intersting but quick
In full: Really enjoyed this event. First time I've done it. Really well run and marshalled (I'm a big fan of jelly babies at drinks stations!) with runners of all levels seeming to be catered for equally well. Will be putting it in my diary for next year, might even step up to 20...!
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Senior Vet
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fantastic race, great organisation, a few challenging hills but a fast course
In full: My first 10m race, usually 10k, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Thank you to the organisers and marshals. Will definitely do it again.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
