Hyde Park 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (17 votes). | 11 to 17 of 17 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2010 race reviewed by: Orangepeel
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice place for a run, well organised. Smoothly done.
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Nazima Chowdhary
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A lovely day for a scenic run, reasonable organisation made up for by the enthusisastic compere/MC. I would have expected the race pack through the post - annoying to have to turn up early at the start of BST.
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Daniela Somerscales
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Average
In full: Race pack had to be collected which meant an early start on day when the clocks go forward. I thought that's what you pay for, to get it delivered. Otherwise ok race- no goody bag.
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Gareth Davies 21
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great location, everyting else was quite average. Quite poor organisation especially at start lack of encouragement and information from marshalls, good PB potential apart from overcrowding on small paths but thats what you expect from a park race. H
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Splinky
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: It was my first 10k but I didn't feel like a newby and I couldn't have asked for a nicer location
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Meatloaf
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised and marshalled- great scenery in a lovely London Park
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Neil Sawyer
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: One of the better 2nd Tier 10k's in London
In full: Good race and plenty of space to run at the start so no people traffic. Good organisation although I felt the security of the bag storage area good have been so much better.
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
