Stanwick Lakes Pumpkin 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (30 votes). | 11 to 20 of 30 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2010 race reviewed by: Delboy1978
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely flat 10k run
In full: enjoyed this 10k did a good second best ever run here, missed pb by 50 secs. Lovely scenic place to run, back next year. Need to get the numbers up for next time bit more publicity as it is a great place to run
Date of review: October 31, 2010
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Dizzy
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A new race and the organisers did very well, we must remember that without these people we would not have events to run. I loved it.
Date of review: November 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Carol Price 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Over-priced made up for by beautiful scenery
In full: Disappointing results service - not even broken down into male and female, let alone age category! Therefore no opportunity of gauging one's own performance against similar age runners.
Date of review: November 2, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Xena_X
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Please keep the marshalls throughout next time.
In full: This was my first race; it was going well until I suddenly realised I was alone! Due to lack of marshalls on the second lap I took a wrong turn; luckily the path converged again with the race but it was not a good experience. A shame, as the location is great and everyone very friendly.
Date of review: November 2, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Crazy Daisy
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great scenery, but poor value for money
In full: Being a local race, this appealed to me. Stanwick Lakes is a beautiful location that I had not run before. Its an easy to find location, with some good facilities that could keep all the family entertained as you go off for a run.
However, the race wasn't worth the hefty £15 entry fee (PLUS £2 parking charge on exit - by far the most expensive run I have entered this year), when it is quite possible to turn up and do the very same run, with the same facilities for the cost of the parking fee.
The marshalling was poor and I was very surprised to see that the marshalls on the first two posts had packed up and left by the time I was on the second of the two laps (I'm not fast by any means, but completed in less than an hour, so don’t think it is unreasonable to expect to see the marshalls still in place). The signage on the route was barely adequate and the risk of going off the route was high - especially on the last lap as the field spread out a bit, a lack of marshalls and not always someone in sight to follow!
The finish was poorly marked with a small flag. With a lot of people milling around at that point, which was also right next to the cups of water, it was hard to know exactly where the finish 'line' was.
Timing was DIY, not even a clock at the finish line (although I see there are times published on the website).
I'm not one to enter races for the goody bag, however I do think the entry fee deserved a little more than the mediocre medal, collected from the water table.
The route itself was pleasant, with some great autumnal scenery. Using the pathways around Stanwick Lakes it wasn’t too muddy, despite the recent weather. As the paths were still open to walkers and visitors there were a few occasions of ‘dodge the children’. I also noticed a couple of runners without numbers, whom I assume were out for a Saturday afternoon run.
Overall, I felt this represented poor value for money. As another reviewer also observed, you can turn up, park and do this same run for the cost of parking. With the absence of any ‘extras’ for running the route in a paid race (goody bag, refreshments, timer, good atmosphere) there seems little incentive to pay a £15 entry fee. At that price, I would rather pay the same entry fee to a charitable fun run.
Date of review: November 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Dr David
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent off road 10k
Date of review: November 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: runbird
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Over priced, inadequately marshalled and lacked atmosphere.
In full: Way over priced at £15 and just a medal no T/shirt or goody bag and too add insult a hefty £2 parking fee! The race was inadequately marshalled, little to no support or encouragement along the way and some junctions only marked with small arrows so potential to take wrong track! As this is a new event I hope the organisers can improve as it does have potential.
Date of review: November 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Sean Cleary
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Agree largely with other recent posts - plus points: scenic, good atmosphere/marshalling; negative points: entry fee and lack of goody bag.
Date of review: November 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Little Miss Giggles
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: November 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Rob Green
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good flat off road race.A tadge pricey.
Date of review: November 1, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
