NJT Supplies Ltd Liversedge Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (232 votes). 2005 race reviewed by: simon franklin 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fantastic challenging race which gives a sense of acheivement on finishing it. Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Ellie.
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Excellent race. Very well organised with good facilities. Great cake afterwards! Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: michael rix
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Poor toilets and parking. Hilly course. Good atmosmphere though Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mad Liz
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Parky weather. Need more loos, but good crowd and freindly organisers. Should be described as hilly. Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: SpeedyGonzaliz
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Fantastic well organised race. In full: I would just like to say well done to the organisers for the fantastic marshalling.
Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Kazevac
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well done to the organisers!! Felt very welcome. Got plenty of support from the Marshalls. Will do it again. Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Thomas Howells
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Great little race, goof for marathon training because of the tough hills In full: A really nice little northern race with some really good scenery and some tough hills to challange runners in a UK running calender that favours PB races. Also a nice friendly atmosphere in the decent indoor changing facility. I would reccomend it to anyone. Date of review: December 16, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: simon franklin 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great - big hills but good atmosphere and scenery. Date of review: September 2, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: SpeedyGonzaliz
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Tough course with steep hills. Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: barkston runner
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: An enjoyable, varied route and a well-organised race Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |