Rough 'n' Tumble 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (285 votes). 2006 race reviewed by: HerefordshireLass
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hard work but great fun! Date of review: January 15, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Debster
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: First X-country run - well-organised and friendly if very muddy in places! Date of review: January 15, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Wobbling Willy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Great race - well organised, a real challenge Date of review: January 15, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Rob Evans 3
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very hilly course - almost mountaneous in places - with some interesting terrains. Was organised very well and I will do it again for sure! Date of review: January 15, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: vito graffagnino
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A really enjoyable run, and its not because i won it this year but the hills, i will never forget, must be the only race i have walked in. Will be back next year it was great. The cakes were something to look forward to fininshing too. Date of review: January 15, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: top banana
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fine views comprising tracks, trails, hills and more hills. Highly recommended! In full: Don't know why people says its not PB potential, it's an odd distance and only in it's 2nd year so there's every chance of a PB (for the course!). Date of review: January 15, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Scunty
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Beautiful scenery and hard work but well worth it with fantastic cakes. In full: Definitely a winner and a much better course than the Terminator, which is staged by the same organiser in the same area. Fantastic views some hard hills but lost of great multi-terrain running through woods, fields and over hilltops. Don't miss the next one! Date of review: March 31, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Run Around
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent challenging run - top tip wear studded trainers or slither your way round! Date of review: January 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Carol Bradwell
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Really felt I had achieved something!! In full: Brilliant, rough, tough but having gone on all fours up one bit, it could only get better. the views, friendliness and cheerfullness of everyone made it a super day. PS who WAS that bloke in the red shorts, whokept going up and down the same ghastly hills all day? Date of review: January 19, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: James Hartill
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hills, mud and sun what more could you ask for on a Sunday morning. In full: Great route, ceratinly challenging. Oh and watching the deer sprint down the "big hill" as I was crawling up it was a great sight. Just need a megaphone at the start, couldn't hear a word. Date of review: January 19, 2005
|

| |