Hanley Building Society Potters Arf Marathon  Here's how RW members rated this race (268 votes). 2005 race reviewed by: NorthernExile
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tougher than expected, not the most scenic - and a *very* long first mile!! In full: I hope someone has got the common-sense to go and measure that first mile and put us all out our misery. WAY long! And this was a HILLY course and I'm used to 'em. That last one as you turned the corner was a killer. Yes, I did run all the way up .... only just though! Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Wavy Davy
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice run but the hills are long! and steep in places. Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Jodie Simpson
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: hills!!! In full: That last hill at 11.5miles was a killer - did anyone actually run all the way up it? It was my first stop and I was so disappointed, before that hill I thought I was going to finish the race without stopping (it would of been a first)!!! It was my second half marathon and I managed a PB so that was good, best start training now for the Robin Hood marathon - I thought that was hilly but nothing compared to this one!! Thank you to everyone that was cheering, the atmosphere was really good!! Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: ian parton
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: wow, tough this one In full: thanks to james hilton 2, about his comment of adding at least 10 mins to your time, as this was only my second half it could have been a bit demoralising,i only knocked 1 min off my pb,we kept going up the hills but never seemed to come down!!!!! Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: wxmrob
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Start could have been on wider/longer road. I'm convinced 1st mile was long. The turnout ofsupport was very good. An enjoyable race. Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: slow donkey
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Bentilee were cheerful again Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Houdini
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great run and a worthy replacment for the potters marathon. In full: tougher than i expected, add at least 10 mins to your expected time. quite hilly, watch out for the last hill, turn the left hand corner and weep! Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: nearlyran
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Undulating, a 13 mile roller coaster, friendly. Date of review: June 12, 2005
|

| |