Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Windsor Half-Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (33 votes).

21 to 30 of 33 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  

2011 race reviewed by: running-man-dan
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: good race
In full: got caught out by the little hills which killed my pb so dont go off fast like i did !!
Date of review: September 26, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
 

2011 race reviewed by: Grayster H
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Surprisingly hilly well organised race with a silly start time
In full: First time I've done this and was surprised how hilly it was. No massive hills (total 700ft ascent over 13.1m) but very bumpy. Didn't seem to be much on the flat except for a mile or so passing the polo fields, where there was a head-on wind to slow you down. It makes finding a pace pretty tough and there were also a few tight bends. It reminded me a bit of a trail run but on tarmac. Last mile down the walk was very fast but seemed very, very long as dead straight!

The parking was very well organised and I had no issues getting in or out. The race HQ was perfect set in the park next to the Long Walk to Windsor Castle. Marshsalling good but not much traffic in the park. Water stations fine but could have been more on a hot day. Either that or provide bottles so runners can carry beyond the station.

My moans would be the start time (1pm). I wouldn't have bothered had I realised as it carves up the entire Sunday. I was also a bit confused by the line-up expected finish times. It seemed that the fastest was 1:30?! I think the start might work better if the road was fenced on both sides much further down the road and there were some pens for expected times. As the fences stopped at 1:45 sign, people poured in there and the start was slow and crowded. Something needs to be done if you want a good start with 4,000 runners on a narrow two-lane road.

A trip around the Great Park makes for some great views including some deer. Support was excellent at the start and at a few points mid-race but mostly fairly quiet.

This is a well organised event with a bumpy course that shouldn't be underestimated.
Date of review: September 26, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Liz Lowe 2
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Not as Good as I'd Hoped
Date of review: September 26, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Richard Hewitt 4
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In full: Well organised with good parking, facilities and interesting course. Will try to do it again.

One question - Was that finish line on wheels? and why did they keep moving further and further away from me?
Date of review: September 26, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Sprint for the line
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Actually quite a dull route, but good spots of support
In full: Maybe it's a sad thing, but I am more interested these days in how the twists and turn of a course affect the time I'm running. As nice as the flora and fauna look I'm always interested in how the gradients and turns affect my running.

Windsor is an interesting one - There's some good stretches to get into a groove, but also quite a low of ups topped with a tight turn into a down.

The course feels like it's mapped out just for the distance, not to be conducive for good running.. The danger of looped course as well means I was overtaking people far before their second lap, and I wasn't sure of what controls stopped people from just cutting down the last mile after lap 1.

Also, I don't expect water cups for £25, I expect bottles - but the lucozade is a nice touch. Maybe a touch expensive for the race, but a popular race can charge a premium.

May be back, might not.
Date of review: September 26, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Hannah Webb
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Undulating is right
In full: I managed to equal my personal best (no great time in itself) so it is possible to do well - just remember to include hills in your training. Most of the hills aren't as bad as all that although the one around mile 8/9 was pretty horrible.

I guess they managed to sort out a lot of the car parking issues reported in 2010 as it took us about 20 minutes to get out, which I think is acceptable!

The only thing I'd change is the start time - 1pm is far too late and it really takes over the whole day - 11am next year at the latest please!
Date of review: September 25, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Rod Newing
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Undulating but very beuutiful course - quite tough
In full: I had never been able to get a place, but finally found the enties open long ago. Even though I had already entered Run to the Beat that day, I decided to waste the fee and run in beautiful parkland instead of East London.

I know the park well, so I knew it would be a hard course - and it was! The toughest was the last mile. As it is dead straight you can see the finishing line, but it just won't get any nearer.
Date of review: September 25, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Manics
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A nice run in manicured countryside
In full: Windsor Great Park is kept immaculate all year by an army of groundskeepers. This run through it is as picture perfect as you could hope for.

There are however 2-3 slow to a crawl hills, not too long in themselves but pretty demanding.

As always, reliably organised and great stewards make the race that much better.

No goody bag this year! Just a medalas you go into the finish funnel, then the next guy gives you a Mars bar and the next guy a bottle of water!
Date of review: September 25, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: rt86
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Excellently organised and marshalled, scenic, challenging, half marathon
In full: My first Windsor HM. Thought it was great. Big thanks to all the young people and their leaders marshalling and at the water stations.

The course is challenging, but in a good way. None of the hills last too long, and of course if you go up you have to come down again.

Just a shame this race clashes with others as it would be good if there were a few more club runners at the front end of the field.
Date of review: September 25, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Charles Jans
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Scenic with good crowd support
In full: Would recommend this one. Some really good crowd support and a lovely setting. All courses should end with a mile downhill to the finish.

Decent value as well given how fast it sells out.


Date of review: September 25, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Runners Need
ah... achilles heel
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013