Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Peckham 10K

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (24 votes).

21 to 24 of 24 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  

2011 race reviewed by: Runnerman999
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: I thought it was a very welcoming event and great atmosphere around. I also agree that the 2km marker was a bit off but didn't really matter. Also there was 1 or 2 stewards who lacked the enthusiasm of others but overall very good!
Date of review: May 7, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2006
 

2011 race reviewed by: Helen Harper 6
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In full: I would echo the comments made here already. Definitely some issue with the placing of the 2km marker as it also took me 15 minutes to get there, but I managed to hit 5km by 25 minutes...and I definitely didn't do 3km in 10 minutes or speed up that quickly!

Similarly, I agree that the interest of the stewards appeared mixed. Some were very encouraging and smiley (particularly the guy at the 8km marker!), but others appeared to have their headphones/phones plugged in. And also there was some definite confusion at the start as to what direction we were supposed to be running.

Also, much as I loved my t-shirt at the end, I would've rather had some water! There was no water available which, in today's humid conditions, was rather unfortunate! Someone told me that the water had actually run out - given that some people still had a lap to do when I finished, the fact they had to run the last bit without water isn't ideal.

Overall, good race in terms of atmosphere and spirits however - and welcoming to new people. Everyone seemed happy and keen to put in a good race. What was also good was that it wasn't over-crowded - so after the usual rush of the first few kms, most people had a decent bit of running space and we weren't falling over each other. Just needs some tweaking on the logistics. Definitely worth it for the low entry fee though.

Date of review: May 7, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: BFH
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Can't really go wrong for £10
Date of review: May 7, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

2011 race reviewed by: Snookiebear
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
20%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Friendly but chaotic
In full: This was a good spirited event but had a fair few downsides.

The lack of any mile markers until 2k was dispiriting, and the fact that it took 15 minutes to reach the 2k mark, but only a further 17 to reach the 5k suggests they weren't placed too accurately.

The marshals were an odd mix - some were enthusiastic and smiley, making eye contact and giving encouragement (many thanks to those!) whereas others were staring at mobile phones, gazing into the middle distance whilst giving little indication of the route, or, in one case, smoking upwind of the runners. Given that there were no signposts (including to the registration desk - hidden at the back of the carpark), that the route involved "following the man on the yellow bike" and that the starting horn, which came with no preamble, caught pretty much the whole group (who were trying to work out if anyone knew which direction we were meant to set off in) by surprise, more high profile marshalling might have helped.

Nevertheless, this race had a friendly atmosphere and, despite being small, didn't feel scary for a relative novice. If the entry fee had been more I would have felt ripped off, but you can't complain too much for £10 (inclding a t shirt!)
Date of review: May 7, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  3  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Runners Need
ah... achilles heel
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013