Warminster Forest 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (33 votes). | 21 to 30 of 33 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
2006 race reviewed by: Fidgety Feet
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A very pleasant way to spend a Sunday morning
In full: A small friendly race, well organised, minor roads and narrow forest trails. A bit hilly in places but last 3 miles mostly downhill and fast. Very nice day out.
Date of review: June 27, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: mi0805runner
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: wonderful day
In full: At the briefing beforehand the organiser quoted 'scenic but challenging' and thats exactly what we got. Just been away for two weeks on hols and didn't run a yard. very pleasantly surprised (considering the terrain)at finishing in 1.32. agreed totally about the butties for lunch!!! well done the organisers. lovelly day out!
Date of review: June 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: John Miller 6
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very enjoyable, More road than trail but still good. Very well organised, distance markers every mile and friendly marshalls everywhere.
Date of review: June 25, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Craig Bridges
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I nice friendly race for all abilities
In full: The course is mostly on roads, but with very little traffic. The route is well designed so that the second half is easier than the first since it is mostly flat or down hill, which makes it good very PB potential.
The organisation is very good, the support from marshals is excellent and there are mile markers every mile; which makes it one of the best 10 milers I've done.
Date of review: June 25, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Matty D
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Tough but fair
In full: Really enjoyed this, like Liz says, there are hills but they're short enough not to worry you. The greasy egg & bacon rolls make a wonderful Sunday lunch after the race.
Date of review: June 25, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: liz gard
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: a great race fairly undulating in the first half but nothing too big
In full: A great run that was well organised over both road and footpaths as this was my first 10 miles i took it easy but wish i had tried a bit harder in the first half as i never did find a really bad hill most of them that were steep were short 50metres at the most will definetly do it again next year
Date of review: June 25, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Dweezil
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice variety of terrain. Well organised and good value
Date of review: June 30, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Simon boast
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice run well organised
Date of review: June 29, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Anthony Fisher
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Forest 10 misleading as 5-6 miles were on road. Made a good training run with half marathons in mind.
Date of review: June 26, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: IncaMarts
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Tough Hill from 4-5. Downhill last 5 miles but too twisty for PB. Good Fun Though
Date of review: September 17, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
