British 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (606 votes). | 21 to 30 of 30 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2004 race reviewed by: Lara Peet
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great fast flat race
Date of review: September 1, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: cool runner
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Easy run, good spirit, fantastic scenery!
Date of review: September 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Marion Paterson
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Despite the rather steep price and the dubious organisation still a great run out and worth it to see London with no traffic!. Terrific atmosphere.
Date of review: September 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Tamsy
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: This was my first 10k race, I really enjoyed it. I think that those walking should have started at the back as they did get in the way especially when walking 5 a breast! The weather was good and partner enjoyed watching so can't complain!!
Date of review: September 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: David Kutner
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Course was mostly on the embankment. Very crowded. Crowds pleasant. Organisation poor, but I believe it has improved. Expensive & no accurate timing. Very difficult to see km markers.
Date of review: September 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: kelly allen
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good fun but needed staggered start
Date of review: September 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: too slow
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Too expensive for what is on offer, medal is tacky
In full: Potenials for a great race event, devalued lack of chip timing for size of field, and cheap medal.
At least we had water this year. Great one of race if you can afford it
Date of review: August 31, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: ARDW
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A badly organised very expensive fun run
Date of review: August 31, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Stephen Cooper
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: soulless and somehow a bit shabby
Date of review: August 26, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% |
In short: Water Shortage inAugust?
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
