Broadland Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (111 votes). | 21 to 30 of 30 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2009 race reviewed by: jfdrake
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely scenery, lovely day
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: eddie greenland
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: very warm good organisation great marshalls all in all excellent
In full: very warm 2 mins down on last year but still my 2nd quickest half marathon ever lovely course but loads of hills very challenging
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: grandad Q
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: a very well organised race
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: pete101
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: a good run,friendly and encouraging support from marshalls
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ben Russell 4
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: loads of friendly marshalls plenty of water stations a lot of hills though. great facilities ji
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: KAREN ALFORD
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Friendly marshalls help the race go more smoothly in glorious Spring weather
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Alison Hodgson
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: hottest day of the year, hilly, excellent marshalling
In full: Wow ! my first time here and amazed at how hilly the course is. The marshalls were fabulous, so encouraging and good spirited which helped me get round. Suffered in the heat a bit,hence new blisters. oh joy... Well done everyone, see you next year.
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: DX432
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | PB potential | | 60% |
In short: Very hilly, and hot
In full: Overall it is a good race, but its very hilly - if you're not going up a hill you're running down one. There was very little flat terrain on the course. Not really a race for a pb, although the last mile was probably the flattest.
Bit annoying how the weather was hot and sunny, today of all days.
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Nik Chapman
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised but a bit hilly for a PB
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Matt Bird
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Really well organised, friendly event. Glorious scenery helped by early spring sunshine. Some challenging hills - who said Norfolk was flat?
Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
